Posted on 05/04/2018 8:46:08 PM PDT by ransomnote
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Exactly. Sometimes it is hard for me to see why everyone can't see it the way you have laid it out.
Thank you again for The Bagster Daily Quorum. I’m a little bit glad of no Q drops because I have no study time. Even java will not give me time to join Q today. I am a LOT sorry we did not have a major 5.5 cinco de mayo roundup and lynching of the usual suspects but slow and steady wins the race.
To all, God Bless You, all here are in my prayers along with PDJT, Q, white hats, the great USofA, our families, friends and all those who need to know Christ and become red-pilled.
Unfortunately, I think the D/S has compromised the EU/NATO group years ago. I have never supported the UN. Too bad there was no Henry Cabot Lodge to defeat that like he did the League of Nations.
Heck Goldwater and Schlafly warned about what we call the D/S and LSM successfully convinced most Americans that they were fruitcakes.
Schlafly wrote about the Bilderberg group. It was decades before I was able to find any additional info on them. Many people said they didn’t exist. And yet they did.
If you never had the pain, don’t discount opioids. Nothing works like them. Had back to back use of 90+ day with 90 days in between. I realize some may become addicted, but frankly I have a Tango Sierra approach to them. Opioids do the job they are prescribed to do. Only a heartless person would deny the pain relief they offer.
Ooorah brother.
I think you may be overlooking the redacted sections of the authorizations. Since the SC claims they are not relevant to the Manafort issues, they could be targeting the HRC campaign.
*************************************************************
Not really. My question pertained to written vs verbal instructions, I assumed that the redacted portions might cover something we’d be happy with or even something we might not like so much.
Redaction was not generic to the issue I was interested in clarifying. I am relieved that a Judge who seems to have some sense will be reviewing it at least. I can wait to hear what the redaction is though I’d like to know right now. LOL
The dynamic is there, but I think the motives are institutional protection (some justified, some not) rather than a desire to gin up public interest.
There is a good reason that the branches of government compete, check and balance, and are not totally transparent with each other.
Law enforcement has many secrets. So does foreign affairs. The justification for keeping substantial chunks secret is pretty good. The world runs partly on subterfuge, brinkmanship, and secrets. With investigations, assume the FBI was investigating a congressman as a foreign agent. Should Congress have a right to see that? maybe better asked, under what circumstances and when (and who) should see that? Of if a congressman is known to be a conduit for information back to a political party that uses hit-teams to take out political opponents. How much do you share with Schiff? Feinstein?
Think of the rules of the game as though your enemies will use the same rules and have the same powers you propose to give to "your guys."
I've pondered long and hard about how to expose and dispose of the DS players in FBI and DOJ, as well as the plain old opportunist skunks. One hopes that a few strategically places levers, like Horowitz, Huber, and likely a few others in other agencies, will shine daylight on some of the corruption. I see Grassley, Nunes, Goodlatte, and a few others are pushing from the Congressional side too - but I give each branch a bit of slack for institutional protection.
Well-intentioned Congressmen are unfortunately just a sideshow.
Someone remind me the last time a Congressional investigation amounted to anything more than a bucket of spit.
I don’t think Sara Carter is to blame for this. She’s just reporting.
I can’t find my better link but here is Trump at Davos. I think he was making a point.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzM2cjuCO2A
I remember on one of the threads, the discussion about raincoats.
But the timing of them stepping forward at that point in the speech, argues against it being raincoat distribution.
I’m going to dinner, maybe Q will post and give us all something else to talk about.
Post em if ya see em.
Back in a while.
Yes! They are excellent !
The vehicles I've seen were all white sedans with the NATO light blue emblems on doors with a unique license plate. Had I not been driving I would have snapped photos. With traffic being what it is on that interstate I can't give a better description and if I attempted it would probably be wrong. The first time my husband was with me and did confirm I read NATO correctly FWIW.
I was wondering what Trump was saying at the time. I should actually watch the speech again for moto.
Agreed 188% Greeneyes.
Thanks!
Just wondered.
The following allegations were within the scope of the investigation at the time of your appointment are are in the within the scope of the Order:[redacted - about as much page space as unredacted Manafort]
[redacted - about three times the page space as unredacted Manafort]
- Allegations that Paul Manafort:
- Committed a crime or crimes by colluding with Russian government officials with respect to the Russian government's efforts to interfere with the 2016 election for President of the United States, in violation of United States law;
- Committed a crime or crimes arising out of payments he received from the Ukrainian government before and during the tenure of President Viktor Yankovych:
You therefore have authority to continue and complete the investigation of those matters, and additional matters described in 28 CFR 600.4. ...
The letter goes on to say that anything else needs a consultation with Rosenstein.
I estimate there are five named potential defendants or people to be investigated, and that the list includes Sessions, Donald Trump Jr., Flynn, and Carter Page.
Rosenstein and Mueller do not want to disclose this scope, and it has nothing to do with tipping off the people under their microscope. Everybody knows.
Thinking over your comment.
I assume you are surmising the Chinese wall and sandbagging and don’t have concreted evidence?
Q says to trust Wray and Sessions. Sessions several times. I assume that Q isn’t just saying that Sessions is well meaning but foiled and hamstrung by bad guys he can do nothing about. I would assume it also means he (and Wray)is on the job and will take the right actions based on the right info. So if that is true, then Sessions could not be crippled and blinded by a raft of black hat underlings that he is somehow helpless to do anything about.
Searching the Q posts for all that included TRUST SESSIONS, and then I looked for some news about the AG around those drop dates. I don't claim that this is comprehensive, but for any doubters, I for one, will continue to trust him and hope he will get all the information he needs knowing that some may be kept from him by bad actors.
December 18 Q drop TRUST SESSIONS
Fox6now.com MILWAUKEE -- Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Monday, December 18th delivered remarks in Milwaukee on efforts to combat violent crime in American cities and neighborhoods. Sessions said he is asking for 40 new prosecutors for violent crime -- with the Milwaukee area getting two.
DOJ Press Release December 21, 2017 Attorney General Jeff Sessions Rescinds 25 Guidance Documents Last month, I ended the longstanding abuse of issuing rules by simply publishing a letter or posting a web page. Congress has provided for a regulatory process in statute, and we are going to follow it. This is good government and prevents confusing the public with improper and wrong advice.
January 14 Q drop TRUST SESSIONS
January 4 Law.com U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Thursday rescinded Obama-era policies shielding marijuana-legalized states
January 22 USA Today In a statement Monday, Sessions said the FBI had not retained messages between the two, from Dec.14, 2016 to May 17, 2017, the day Mueller was appointed to lead Justice's inquiry into Russia interference in the 2016 election. We will leave no stone un-turned to confirm with certainty why these text messages are not now available to be produced and will use every technology available to determine whether the missing messages are recoverable from another source," Sessions said.
FEB 18, 2018 Q post TRUST SESSIONS
February 18, Washington Examiner Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in an interview aired Sunday the process used by the FBI to obtain warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act will be investigated after allegations of abuses of power committed by the agency under the Obama administration.
March 8, 2018. Q post Do you TRUST SESSIONS? BOOM
March 8 http://sd30.senate.ca.gov/news/news/2018-03-08-march-8-2018-hill-trump-sessions-escalate-war-california Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Wednesday announced a new lawsuit against the state of California, escalating a war of words between the conservative administration and the liberal capital of the so-called resistance.
Sessions also announced later in March Daily Beast Apr 3 without saying anything publicly at the time, he had appointed the U.S. Attorney for Utah, John Huber, to team up with Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz to conduct an internal investigation into all the questions that Republicans in Congress have raised about the FBI and its allegedly raging anti-Trumpery.
April 10 Q drop TRUST SESSIONS
April 10 Washington Post In a statement Monday, Sessions said he would not renew the National Commission on Forensic Science, a roughly 30-member advisory panel of scientists, judges, crime lab leaders, prosecutors and defense lawyers chartered by the Obama administration in 2013. A path to meet needs of overburdened crime labs will be set by a yet-to-be-named senior forensic adviser and an internal department crime task force, Sessionss statement said.
Just looked it up online and each had an umbrella in their hand.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.