Thinking over your comment.
I assume you are surmising the Chinese wall and sandbagging and don’t have concreted evidence?
Q says to trust Wray and Sessions. Sessions several times. I assume that Q isn’t just saying that Sessions is well meaning but foiled and hamstrung by bad guys he can do nothing about. I would assume it also means he (and Wray)is on the job and will take the right actions based on the right info. So if that is true, then Sessions could not be crippled and blinded by a raft of black hat underlings that he is somehow helpless to do anything about.
I have concrete evidence. Sessions is recused from matters involving the Trump campaign, therefore there is a Chinese wall that sequesters him from investigations into the Trump campaign.
Sessions did not respond to a letter from Congress relating to FBI malfeasance. If he had received the letter, he would have responded. The Chinese wall in DOJ is withholding FBI malfeasance material from Sessions, even though Sessions is not recused from FBI malfeasance issues.
-- So if that is true, then Sessions could not be crippled and blinded by a raft of black hat underlings that he is somehow helpless to do anything about. --
Wray (I know, doesn't follow from the blockquote) is not recused from anything. He's moving slow, but he has taken out a few bad apples when they act up, like the scum who issued a press release purporting to speak for the FBI.
I guess I better look that up - I know you are going to ask ...
FBI Statement on HPSCI Memo was issued with no signature,k and was critical of the release of the HPSCI (Nunes) memo. The FBI statement was prepared and released without Wray's approval, by Mike Kortan, FBI assistant director for public affairs. Kortan is gone.
That FBI press release generated a veritable crap storm in the press, "Trump defies his FBI," etc.
back to the subject.
Sessions is crippled by a combination of DOJ regulation and investigation being into Trump's campaign. But even if he hadn't worked on the campaign, the DS would find some reason to demand he recuse, just as it did when accusations of obstruction (for firing Comey) came up, the DEMs called for Rosenstein to recuse (remember that?) because he wrote the fire Comey memo, and of course had it in for Comey and would exonerate Trump.
Something has to happen, and it's best not coming from Sessions, to uncripple Sessions at least so he can go after criminal prosecutions in the FISA abuse / frame Trump scandal.
As for what Q says about trust - take it as a simple admonition. Those guys are white hats, playing by the book. Exact details (and any informed speculation) are for the experts to understand, at least for now.