I have concrete evidence. Sessions is recused from matters involving the Trump campaign, therefore there is a Chinese wall that sequesters him from investigations into the Trump campaign.
Sessions did not respond to a letter from Congress relating to FBI malfeasance. If he had received the letter, he would have responded. The Chinese wall in DOJ is withholding FBI malfeasance material from Sessions, even though Sessions is not recused from FBI malfeasance issues.
-- So if that is true, then Sessions could not be crippled and blinded by a raft of black hat underlings that he is somehow helpless to do anything about. --
Wray (I know, doesn't follow from the blockquote) is not recused from anything. He's moving slow, but he has taken out a few bad apples when they act up, like the scum who issued a press release purporting to speak for the FBI.
I guess I better look that up - I know you are going to ask ...
FBI Statement on HPSCI Memo was issued with no signature,k and was critical of the release of the HPSCI (Nunes) memo. The FBI statement was prepared and released without Wray's approval, by Mike Kortan, FBI assistant director for public affairs. Kortan is gone.
That FBI press release generated a veritable crap storm in the press, "Trump defies his FBI," etc.
back to the subject.
Sessions is crippled by a combination of DOJ regulation and investigation being into Trump's campaign. But even if he hadn't worked on the campaign, the DS would find some reason to demand he recuse, just as it did when accusations of obstruction (for firing Comey) came up, the DEMs called for Rosenstein to recuse (remember that?) because he wrote the fire Comey memo, and of course had it in for Comey and would exonerate Trump.
Something has to happen, and it's best not coming from Sessions, to uncripple Sessions at least so he can go after criminal prosecutions in the FISA abuse / frame Trump scandal.
As for what Q says about trust - take it as a simple admonition. Those guys are white hats, playing by the book. Exact details (and any informed speculation) are for the experts to understand, at least for now.
I view him as heavy artillery that is cloaked until the enemy is drawn into the kill zone.
Rosenstein, Wray and possibly even Mueller are playing their parts as well.
Think about the Battle of Agincourt, where the French soldier-nobility was lured into range of the English peasant longbow archers who (though greatly outnumbered!) destroyed the French.
Things are slow around here, so there's always this:
We few we, happy few, we band of brothers; For he to-day that sheds his blood with me Shall be my brother: be he ne'er so vile, This day shall gentle his condition; And Gentlemen in England now abed Shall think themselves accursed they were not here, And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks That fought with us upon Saint Crispians day.