Posted on 05/04/2018 8:46:08 PM PDT by ransomnote
Boente is another of these that seems to be in the mix of the black hats & Comey bud but may just be slimy vs. dirty ... I like the term noted last night (please forgive me which other poster) - LEVERAGED? ... TBD ;)
Obama can have 2 more years. During that time, he can find a way to become President for life, maybe get his Iranian friends to nuke a city. The traitors were going it slow because they thought they had it in the bag, but after losing in 2016, they may take more desperate measures the next time they have a chance.
verbal discussions rather moot
That’s not entirely true. Information outside the contract (letters, verbal discussions) can be used to clarify the meaning of the contract. Most contracts contain a clause the forbids the use of such evidence, because otherwise, it is admissible. Outside evidence cannot be used to contradict the plain terms of a written contract, where it is clear that the parties intended that the contract be an “integrated”, i.e., whole, contract.
************************************************************
Hence the term rather moot instead of saying entirely moot.
While it has been about 50 years since my business law class, I do recall that the cases and appeals I studied then, always fell back on the principle that the written contract was the whole enchilada.
Any side discussions of importance, not in the contract, should have been added. Now that may have been the instructors intent-to demonstrate the importance of a complete contract.
However, I did do some additional research in the legal section, but did not find any cases contrary to that principle, though I am sure that there were Judges who might have ruled differently then and in the 50 years since then.
Hence the term rather moot, rather than totally irrelevant and entirely moot.
That was you at post 945 in this thread. Based on that post, I put you on my "do not correspond" list. My prerogative, it cause you no harm, and saves me time.
You are of course free to post to me or pretend I don't exist. I'm indifferent.
I'm replying this one time because you addressed an obvious thoughtful remark to me personally.
-- Not exactly what people like me are saying. ... he allowed himself to be taken out of the equation entirely and let a DS Deputy create a firestorm that the President has to deal with every day from a phony allegation ... --
Either Sessions follows the rules governing conflict (28 CFR 45.2) or not.
Rosenstein and the people managing Sessions' Chinese wall are sandbagging him, sequestering hims from all sorts of stuff that he (Sessions) is not recused from. This makes a hot mess.
Go for it! It is just an emoji... Unhappily, it seems to display a bit differently on different devices; on some it looks like a rat, on some it looks like a mouse... too much above my pay grade - pauper! On a hat or T-shirt that wouldn't be a factor, would it?
Boente is now General Counsel at FBI, took James Baker's job.
In October, Boente, a career prosecutor, announced his plans to step down upon Senate confirmation of his successors. In November, CNN reported Boente had privately been in talks for several weeks about a variety of other law enforcement positions within the administration that he might be interested in taking after his successors are confirmed, according to a source with knowledge of the discussions.
Dana Boente picked as new FBI general counsel - CNN - January 23, 2018
That is the danger, for sure... what we are all watching. Right now they are foolishly lobbying for civil war... stupid!
Mark
At the risk of communicating even though I have apparently made it to your blacklist, I will address your claim that Sessions was required under 28 CFR 45.2 to recuse himself. As noted by Andrew McCarthy (former fed prosecutor) and others, the memo that Sessions was given was incorrect as to the requirements of the situation, and Sessions was snookered by career DOJ folks into the recusal. I read the articles at the time, looked at the rules, and by jove! he was indeed snookered. He should have stayed at his post. Instead he deserted.
If you don't mind, could you expand on the above? How do you know that they are sandbagging him, and I'm not sure what a Chinese wall is... And I looked up sandbagging, and there are two distinct meanings. I assume you mean attacking, not underperforming?
Yeah, in any contract case, it’s not so simple. There is almost always a way to get in a discussion about what the parties intended if there is any ambiguity about a material term, and sometime even if there isn’t. Reality usually butts heads with those business law classes you took. A good judge won’t admit outside evidence about a term if the contract is clear; sadly, I find good judges who are strict about such things more and more rare.
:)
A very wise protocol. I do the same, it seems to work more effectively if I save it for serious pain.
It was just a yok comment. I don't know a lot about him... saw him often on Ancient Aliens - a program whose principle I do not embrace, but it was a great source of new archaeological information. I learned about Göbekli Tepe on the show and upbraided the archaeological mag I subscribe to for never mentioning it.
I just feel - like Sherlock Holmes - that the simplest solution to a mystery is the most likely; not saying that their idea is incorrect, just not my first choice.
I glanced over your linked page, but in my present health couldn't really dwell on it to any advantage. Tomorrow: roust up the doctor for some action!
I’m not suggesting I’m smarter than Trump, I’ve been saying that Trump got screwed by Sessions and his recusal and failure to exercise supervision over RR and attack the deep state. I didn’t see that coming when Sessions was appointed, I thought it was a great appointment, and I think Trump did, too. It was after that that it became clear that Trump was screwed by Sessions’ recusal, and at that point, it was too late to replace him.
As to Sessions, I don’t know what they have on him, but either they have something, or he is the most feckless, inept AG in history. If it’s the latter, he didn’t show it previously. Therefore, I’m leaning towards the former.
I don’t think we disagree about Holder vs Sessions. I’m not saying that Sessions should go after political enemies, I’m saying he should protect his President. Holder did that by being a criminal and pursuing good citizens. Sessions should do that by pursuing criminals and deflecting efforts to frame a good citizen (Trump) with phony charges.
As to what Sessions has done so far, the one effort we know about, he hired a Democrat from Utah to look at a criminal referral. Other than that, crickets. And then there is the war on marijuana, that’s important stuff. Oh, he had a nice press conference about pursuing leakers, and right next to him was our buddy, RR, who was deputized to take charge of that effort. Good stuff.
LOL. If it was an accident, I would never admit it now.
You seem to want to think that Sessions is a doofus do-nothing. Your points about Huber and marijuana show your bias against him, and your unwillingness to actually find out what the truth is.
If a person wants to know the truth, they have to be willing to follow where ever the truth leads, even if it’s a destination you don’t already know.
If you think you already know everything, you will never know the truth.
Info from Sara Carter about Sessions
(h/t sheikdetailfeather)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3653011/posts?page=2#2
The reason President Trump is not testifying
(h/t iontheball)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3653056/posts?page=50#50
It's because you're honest and a man of integrity. I'm not saying Wilcock isn't interesting, and he has hooks that draw you in. I commented because he uses a style I recognize. I'll spend some time and come up with an example im more depth of what I'm trying to say - not picking on him so much as the genre. Always big promises with the carrot just over the horizon.
I think it's VERY interesting that you have 3 unpublished books. I'll have to check that out. ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.