Q Anon: (4/30/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

qanon.pub ^ | 4/30/18 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. Each live stream video remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronym definitions to help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[hoosiermama]

OR
K-nock. K-nock

Whose There?

[tang-soo]

:)

[RitaOK]

All those links. Can you give a summary, no? I scroll better than I can click and chase.

[madison10]

Bagster, this is cool.

[txhurl]

It’s the most environmemtally-friendly package ever imagined then delivered. Kinda like directed lightning, which, as you know, fertilizes. Instantly.

[Steven W.]

definitely plausible IMO: "Trump never had any intention of Admiral Jackson being the Secretary of Veterans Affairs —choosing, instead, to use him a “bait” in this intelligence operation to destroy this plot"

[pa_dweller]

I must admit the NSA didn’t register with me at first (confirmation bias effect?). It does seem to be consensus that NSA is white hat but I’m sure even they have their DS lurkers.

[Disestablishmentarian]

>>Excuse me...<<

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Rita, I think I was trying to agree with you—if your point was that Petraeus sees a different reality now, in the Trump era.

[STARLIT]

Fantastic piece: “It’s hard to imagine anything worse for a democracy than journalists coordinating with political operatives and spies who are paid by the press to leak information about American citizens. But that’s where we are. We have hit rock-bottom. https://t.co/qoG1v49Nf5— Tracybeanz (@tracybeanz) May 2, 2018

Tracybeanz ‏ -

Fantastic piece: “It’s hard to imagine anything worse for a democracy than journalists coordinating with political operatives and spies who are paid by the press to leak information about American citizens. But that’s where we are. We have hit rock-bottom.

[Publius]

Actually, we hit rock bottom some time ago. We’ve since crashed through that bottom and found a whole new bottom.

[STARLIT]

http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/261158/trump-russia-collusion

So, according to Simpson, the Trump Tower meeting proved the part of the Steele dossier that claimed the Trump team was taking the Kremlin’s dirt is true—meaning that Simpson is virtually admitting that the meeting between Trump Jr. and Veselnitskaya, his business partner, was a set up. The dossier memo that claims the Trump team wanted dirt on Clinton is dated June 20, a week and a half after the June 9 meeting—at which that dirt was offered, and which was arranged to help establish the collusion thesis. In Simpson’s Aug. 22, 2017 testimony, the phrase “disclosures this year” refers to a New York Times article published a little more than a month previously, July 8, reporting that the president’s eldest son met the previous year with a Russian lawyer, who, according to the Times, “has connections to the Kremlin.” Who, you might ask, gave that story to the Times?

Even the Times’ original story on the Veselnitskaya meeting emphasized her links to the Kremlin. That’s the point of the set-up, to underscore her relationship with Russian officials in order to substantiate the Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Yet now, that information, which the paper itself reported, has been retroactively imagined away. The purpose of the recent Times story—asserting no one really knew before now of her deep Kremlin links—is to cover the paper’s own role in the operation, while perpetuating the Trump-Russia narrative.

While it is difficult even for partisans to retail the literal version of the collusion thesis with a straight face, some version of that narrative, however qualified, or figurative, has to be true—or else the Times, like the Post, CNN, NBC, and countless other media organizations have printed thousands of stories and editorials whose underlying premise is simply false, sending the reputations of dozens of reporters and opinionators up in smoke, Pulitzer Prizes and all.

It’s hard to imagine anything worse for a democracy than journalists coordinating with political operatives and spies who are paid by the press to leak information about American citizens. But that’s where we are. We have hit rock-bottom.

ARE NBC AND CNN PAYING OFF TOP SPIES WHO LEAKED INFO WITH ON-AIR JOBS?
News of the News: How the ‘Trump-Russia collusion’ sausage gets made

By Lee Smith
May 1, 2018 • 9:30 PM

[grey_whiskers]

Actually, we hit rock bottom some time ago. We’ve since crashed through that bottom and found a whole new bottom.

All the way down to

...China.

[STARLIT]

Yes, sadly we have and the media sees absolutely nothing dirty about their jobs...after all everyone plays that way.

[defconw]

Start 631

[bagster]

All the way down to...China.

I will bring you down....

[Axenolith]

L8

[Disestablishmentarian]

>>You would think that Q would see how much Q-ing around we're doing and give us a drop to work on...<< ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I am still savoring the epic Q drops on Iran, Syria (Iran's hidden nuclear program), EU and U1 ... all conveniently verified by Netanyahu ... if one was paying attention to Q's "map."

And why is there no more mention of the Israeli strikes in Syria on Sunday? When they first hit the Internet it was even suggested Israel had used tactical nukes.

And why have we forgotten about the mysterious collapse of the mountain in NK that immediately preceded the end of their nuclear aspirations? Rods from God? Destroyed the core of the capabilities including 200 top scientists?

And how about the U.S. beginning to repel invaders at the southern border? The start of a West Bank in Mexico? Will the U.S. military have to invade Mexico to stop them from entering and acquiring "rights"?

[WildHighlander57]

NIKK wrote: " Fantastic piece: “It’s hard to imagine anything worse for a democracy than journalists coordinating with political operatives and spies who are paid by the press to leak information about American citizens. But that’s where we are. We have hit rock-bottom. https://t.co/qoG1v49Nf5— Tracybeanz (@tracybeanz) May 2, 2018 Tracybeanz ‏ - Fantastic piece: “It’s hard to imagine anything worse for a democracy than journalists coordinating with political operatives and spies who are paid by the press to leak information about American citizens. But that’s where we are. We have hit rock-bottom."" Knowledge is power. Red-pilled is power. MAGA!!

[edzo4]

[StormFlag]

Thank you, sad but true. Great article.