I think it’s saying that the post was traced and the source IP address was fake.
That’s just my guess.
Any other interpretations?
Not fake. Untraceable, or something a spook might use? Or a serious hacker type?
Some other poster explained it above (KitJ?)
I don't know jack about that kinda stuff so have to rely on our resident geeks.
For some reason, I see this one as clear as a bell, thanks to KitJ. Course, I (and he) could totally wrong. But I don't think so.
Waiting for more smart people to chime in.
I think Kitj and Bagster have it all figured out. See previous posts!
This is moving along quickly tonight! A bit like the middle of a John Carre’ novel!
Yes, I think you are correct about the address. Kitj as additional thoughts on this.