1 posted on
04/24/2018 10:47:19 PM PDT by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
2 posted on
04/24/2018 10:59:16 PM PDT by
Amberdawn
(If Leftists Didn't Live By Double Standards, They'd Have No Standards At All.)
To: Olog-hai
Why on earth should an independent Greenland be part of “Europe”?? It’s not in Europe.
3 posted on
04/24/2018 11:01:19 PM PDT by
Enchante
(FusionGPS "dirty dossier" scandal links Hillary, FBI, CIA, Dept of Justice... "Deep State" is real)
To: Olog-hai
I wonder how they’ll do without the subsidy from Denmark.
4 posted on
04/24/2018 11:03:07 PM PDT by
Cowboy Bob
("Other People's Money" = The life blood of Liberalism)
To: Olog-hai
The neocons will insist that we send in troops to keep “the homeland” safe.
To: Olog-hai
Man, that place will sure hold a lot of Somalian and Syrian, ah, “refugees”.
To: Olog-hai
With a gross domestic product of $2.2 billion in 2015, an independent Greenland would be the poorest country in Europe along with San Marino. San Marino is not poor. It's GDP is $1.9 billion, but the GDP per capita is $49K -- in comparison the GDP per cap of the USA is $61K and of Japan is $40K.
San Marino is definitely not poor
8 posted on
04/25/2018 12:21:50 AM PDT by
Cronos
(Obama's dislike of Assad is not based on his brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
To: Olog-hai
If anyone would benefit from global warming, it would be Greenland.
To: Olog-hai
“... when to secede, and how to do so without impoverishing the island.”
“Rich in unexploited natural resources, Greenland...”
“... when to secede, and how to do so without impoverishing the island.”
“Rich in unexploited natural resources, Greenland...”
“... when to secede, and how to do so without impoverishing the island.”
“Rich in unexploited natural resources, Greenland...”
Nope, I don’t see any way either.
13 posted on
04/25/2018 2:37:03 AM PDT by
Moltke
(Reasoning with a liberal is like watering a rock in the hope to grow a building.)
To: Olog-hai
If Greenland really plans to declare independence, the Russians will be right there offering all sorts of inducements to let them explore the resources under the ice.
15 posted on
04/25/2018 3:55:37 AM PDT by
Truth29
To: Olog-hai
If Denmark leaves Greenland, we need to occupy the place — for strategic reasons.
And maybe joint “condiminium” rule with Canada would be an option.
But if we and the Canadians maintain a 100% hands-off posture, the Chinese will surely try to take over the mineral resources — while maybe letting the Russians have Thule.
17 posted on
04/25/2018 6:22:28 AM PDT by
Hawthorn
To: Olog-hai
"More than 2.5 million years ago Greenland looked like the green Alaskan tundra, before it was covered by the second largest body of ice on Earth," the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory said in a statement Thursday. And supposedly it's now threatened by global warming? Yeah and Faeries wear boots!
20 posted on
04/25/2018 8:28:03 AM PDT by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: Olog-hai
While Denmarks constitution recognizes the islands right to decide on its own independence, if it became a sovereign nation it would lose the much-needed subsidies, which make up 60 percent of Greenlands annual budget.
Sounds like Puerto Rico with icebergs.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson