Spell it out, please, for us non-lawyers.
Sorry, I’m kind of dense on this.....
I’m assuming that it is/was illegal to go to NK?
Why would NK offer to sell missiles to the US? Presumably their tech is nowhere near as advanced as ours.
What was that all about??
They offered to sell them to HER. Explains how a public servant from Cali can be so rich.
No, and certainly not as part of a Congressional delegation.
-- Why would NK offer to sell missiles to the US? --
Braggadocio, threat, "we are in this for money" could also be talken as "we are not a threat." Who knows if that was even said, in any event it is odd.
The way I took Q's implication, Pelosi gets a cut of proliferation bucks. She says she is against proliferation, but wants to make sure it continues apace unless caught red-handed. Deep State likes to have an existential threat to point to, to justify all sorts of reaction. "Let's you and him fight."
What was that all about??
Riddle me this: Was Q brining this up and then mentioning Pelosi's mega-wealth inferring that she took Kim up on the offer to deal weapons for him?
1) If North Korea were selling missiles, wouldn't this knowledge be classified at least Top Secret if not SAP?
2) If North Korea were selling missiles, and Pelosi either arranged for them to be paid *NOT* to sell missiles, or (stupider yet) brokered a deal to sell them somewhere _else_, gosh, how many crimes at what level ("*aid*" and comfort, recall that the North Korean war is still going, there is just an armistice, not cessation of a state of war) does that cover?