To: NIKK
Wouldn’t taking out the chemical plant release those chemicals onto the surrounding population?
1,092 posted on
04/13/2018 7:39:03 PM PDT by
Duchess47
("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
To: Duchess47
Mattie said that part of the criteria for choosing targets was not the ones that would spread chems
To: Duchess47
I’m in the dark here. I haven’t a clue. Maybe a military freeper here could answer you.
1,098 posted on
04/13/2018 7:41:50 PM PDT by
STARLIT
(Trust The Plan.)
To: Duchess47
Maybe if it was incinerated nice and hot?
Not safe in a neighborhood even if not bombed, no doubt.
1,122 posted on
04/13/2018 7:49:35 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
To: Duchess47
The plant will likely contain reservoirs or tanks of
feedstocks: chemical precursors or ingredients, as it were.
Any manufactured chemical weapons are likely stored separately, if not actively dispersed (and under heavy guard) as well : striking the plants will take out the mixing and quality control facilities, as well as ingredient stores..
1,321 posted on
04/13/2018 10:25:00 PM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson