Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: NIKK

Wouldn’t taking out the chemical plant release those chemicals onto the surrounding population?


1,092 posted on 04/13/2018 7:39:03 PM PDT by Duchess47 ("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1090 | View Replies ]


To: Duchess47

Mattie said that part of the criteria for choosing targets was not the ones that would spread chems


1,095 posted on 04/13/2018 7:41:17 PM PDT by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1092 | View Replies ]

To: Duchess47

I’m in the dark here. I haven’t a clue. Maybe a military freeper here could answer you.


1,098 posted on 04/13/2018 7:41:50 PM PDT by STARLIT (Trust The Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1092 | View Replies ]

To: Duchess47

Maybe if it was incinerated nice and hot?

Not safe in a neighborhood even if not bombed, no doubt.


1,122 posted on 04/13/2018 7:49:35 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1092 | View Replies ]

To: Duchess47
The plant will likely contain reservoirs or tanks of feedstocks: chemical precursors or ingredients, as it were.

Any manufactured chemical weapons are likely stored separately, if not actively dispersed (and under heavy guard) as well : striking the plants will take out the mixing and quality control facilities, as well as ingredient stores..

1,321 posted on 04/13/2018 10:25:00 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1092 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson