Posted on 04/07/2018 8:08:50 AM PDT by EveningStar
Molly Ringwald rose to prominence as John Hughes muse in the hit films Sixteen Candles, Pretty in Pink, and The Breakfast Club, but her most beloved movies are troubling her in hindsight. In a new essay for The New Yorker, Ringwald salutes and critiques her collaborations with Hughes, finding certain scenes in the directors films to be misogynistic and homophobic. The actress makes it clear she loves Hughes and is proud of their work together, but that doesnt mean their films should not be analyzed under a contemporary context.
While Ringwald was showing her daughter The Breakfast Club for the first time, the moment in which Judd Nelsons Bender peeks up her characters skirt stood out and made Ringwald uncomfortable. The actress writes that she kept thinking about the scene long after the viewing ended, and it wasnt the first time she was forced to come to terms about its meaning.
(Excerpt) Read more at indiewire.com ...
If you listen to a lot of Richard Pryor routines back from the 70s, he wouldn’t get away with most of that stuff today.
Oy! These Hollywood people and their EGOS!
Might not just be ego. In that business, attention can equal money. I've been noticing over the last few years the reemergence of a lot of older actors whom we haven't heard from in years. Jean Claude Van Damme has been more prominent lately, and I was stunned to see Jerry Lewis appearing in a movie for the first time in decades.
They are remaking "Karate Kid" with Ralph Macchio and Billy Zabka.
And of course the various iterations of "the expendables" has had all sorts of old actors (Dolph Lundgren, et al) showing up in the public consciousness again.
There are others, but I don't remember exactly who, I just noted at the time that I hadn't seen anything from them in a very long time, and suddenly they are back making movies.
I'm wondering if Molly has a money problem (ala Nicholas Cage) and wants to attract attention because she's hoping for some acting work?
Or it could just be ego. :)
The headline is not the essay. A thoughtful piece by Molly Ringwald. Was an is a gorgeous person and smarter than the average bear. Recommend you read the original New Yorker story and decide for yourself, FReeps.
benighted is my new favorite work btw :)
Waving her arms wildly from the Island of Irrelevence.
RLTW
Man, I miss the 80s!
Oh gawd....
No more yankee my wankee
The Donger need food!
I ignored the John Hughes movies way back when, and I’ve never cared about them since.
“No black, mexican, asian, trans, lesbian, gay characters?”
In other words, no useless or token characters.
Probably laying the groundwork to sign up to the #metoo movement.
She must be broke.
5.56mm
Stupid movie. Homely woman.
I DID read it, but then went back to see if there was something I missed. I don't see anything thoughtful at all there, except the virtue signaling of a liberal has-been.
...I thought about it again this past fall, after a number of women came forward with sexual-assault accusations against the producer Harvey Weinstein, and the #MeToo movement gathered steam, Ringwald writes. If attitudes toward female subjugation are systemic, and I believe that they are, it stands to reason that the art we consume and sanction plays some part in reinforcing those same attitudes...
Now, if she had made a comment about gun play in liberal movie productions and has said "...If attitudes toward female subjugation gun violence are systemic, and I believe that they are, it stands to reason that the art we consume and sanction plays some part in reinforcing those same attitudes...
But she doesn't, even though I don't doubt for a minute she wouldn't have the guts to tell that to some well known leftist producers.
She wouldn't work another day in the industry, if she had a chance to anyway.
And who are the biggest purveyors of sexual exploitation and subjugation in the industry (not to mention foul language and explicit violence)? It isn't people who make films like "Paul, Apostle of Christ". It is people like her buddy Weinstein and everyone who chummed around with him until he became too toxic.
So, I would disagree it is a thoughtful piece by Molly Ringwald. It is exactly what one would expect from a Leftist who was happy to take money for doing something, only to have to rationalize it to herself later.
"analyzed under a contemporary context."
The most ruthless and barbaric regimes in history have used this degree of thought to upturn societies. The goal is always to restart at day zero and burn the past. The Nazis, Soviets, Mao, Pol Pot among others put the boot on the neck and barrel to the head to force the people to conform in this fashion.
"...I was a young actress trying to get ahead, and I was paid well for that movie, including the part where the guy looked up my skirt. Truth is, boys do that kind of thing. They know it isn't the right or gentlemanly thing to do, and if caught, get very embarrassed. But teenage boys do try anyway, and that is just part of male nature. Thing is, it is a movie. I profited from it, and became famous because of it..."
Two dollars!
and puffing up to about 2.5X her “teen” size
Judd Nelson did say Claire was a fat girls name....
And with that nugget, you are exactly correct.
I had the misfortune of seeing Ms. Ringwald in an off-broadway play some years ago. She was a mediocre dancer who didn't have the skill or conditioning to perform, didn't have the stage presence and no voice for the singing.
She was cute enough back in the day but has matured into an average woman with below average skills for a high-expertise profession.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.