Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

VANITY: American Airlines Flight DFW to LA. Ran low on Gas while taxing?
Me | April 5, 2018 | Vespa300

Posted on 04/05/2018 6:44:01 AM PDT by vespa300

Sorry for the Vanity. Just had to ask. Had a weird flight a couple of days ago. DFW to L.A. American Airlines. We taxied out as usual, didn't seem that long, no more than usual...and then we turned and headed back to the gate.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: airlineflight; aviation; dfw; fuel; runway; weird
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
Sorry for the Vanity. Just had to ask. Had a weird flight a couple of days ago. DFW to L.A. American Airlines. We taxied out as usual, didn't seem that long, no more than usual...and then we turned and headed back to the gate. The Pilot said something like "all this taxing caused us to return for more fuel." I found that weird. An hour delay. If that wasn't enough, on approach to LAX, engines suddenly revved and we went from descent to climb. The guy next to me said.."the copilot must be flying this thing." We were all turned around now, over the Pacific, and different direction and well..finally landed. But I have never had the fuel thing happen. Any comments or input? Has this happened to anyone? I fly about 10 or 12 times a year..never happened. Sorry for the vanity...thanks.
1 posted on 04/05/2018 6:44:01 AM PDT by vespa300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vespa300
The Pilot said something like "all this taxing caused us to return for more fuel."

Tax reform!

2 posted on 04/05/2018 6:45:13 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

They’re supposed to land with a 10% fuel reserve.

If they project a lower reserve early on, they may be required to return to top off.


3 posted on 04/05/2018 6:46:38 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

I bet that was “taxing”.


4 posted on 04/05/2018 6:46:55 AM PDT by Rannug (When you're dead, you're dead. Until then fight with everything you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Thanks. Just didn’t seem like it we were out there that long to run low. I guess it’s possible. Thanks.


5 posted on 04/05/2018 6:49:14 AM PDT by vespa300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

Maybe trying to cover up that they forgot to fill up the tank before leaving the gate. If on a road trip I realize that I forgot, I’d prefer to say it might be good to top off the tank before we go any further.


6 posted on 04/05/2018 6:50:12 AM PDT by Reno89519 (If Trump can't deliver and folds like a typical Republican, maybe he should be impeached.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vespa300
I've heard of it before.

Flying around fuel you don't need costs the airlines money, and puts undue stress on the aircraft.

So they carry the minimum safe amount, plus a cushion for the usual delays. This delay must have been unusual, and cut into their safety reserve.

7 posted on 04/05/2018 6:51:26 AM PDT by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

In the fast few years airlines have been putting as little fuel in planes as they can get away with. Less fuel, less weight. I don’t like it at all.


8 posted on 04/05/2018 6:51:47 AM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

To be honest, that was my first thought. Somebody screwed up.


9 posted on 04/05/2018 6:51:53 AM PDT by vespa300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

Maybe while they were taxiing ATC changed their route, or winds aloft changed, necessitating additional fuel. I think they usually plan their fuel loads pretty precisely.


10 posted on 04/05/2018 6:51:57 AM PDT by youthphil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

Fuel = weight. Too much of wrong weight = lower profits. Its a balancing game.


11 posted on 04/05/2018 6:52:21 AM PDT by jettester (I got paid to break 'em - not fly 'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

They don’t completely fill the fuel tanks for a shorter flight. The extra weight would just burn more fuel. But they might be cutting things a little close if they’re not sure they can make it to their destination after idling the engines for an hour or so.


12 posted on 04/05/2018 6:52:38 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

I used to live in LA, and have probably flown into LAX thirty times, maybe 50. Once as we were approaching from the east we were told that we had to make another approach because ground control was “turning the runways around”. The pilot made this announcement, and then corrected himself, saying “They’re actually turning the traffic pattern around, the runways are staying the way they are”. We then went out over the Pacific and landed. Sounds like that’s what happened to you.


13 posted on 04/05/2018 6:53:45 AM PDT by Flash Bazbeaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

“...fill up...”

Planes usually carry enough fuel for the flight plus reserves. They don’t fill up; fuel is heavy and is costly.

If the pilot taxis too long or finds out there are greater head winds on the flight after gate departure, he would then return to get more fuel.

He was doing the right thing.


14 posted on 04/05/2018 6:54:02 AM PDT by budj (combat vet, 2nd of 3 generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

Fuel consumption is based on weight/passengers - either the plane was close to its maximum hopping distance already, they miscalculated the weight/passengers or they never checked the fuel gauge until they started taxiing. In any event they lied to you! :)

The aborted landing approach may have been a mistake or the air traffic control might’ve told them to divert (traffic, weather, priority, etc)


15 posted on 04/05/2018 6:54:57 AM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

What happens is that excessive taxi times sometimes burns up the reserve fuel that is is held is storage in the aircraft fuel tanks for emergency operations, caused by bad weather, heavy traffic, mechanical problems, during the flight route, etc. A captain will always opt for a safety margin to have more then enough fuel on board as he takes off...just in case.

Your “go-around” at LAX is usually caused by traffic on the ground, delayed for a take-off or traffic problem. Either the tower will call for the “go-around” or the Captain will call for it..if he deems it necessary to avoid an accident or a potential unsafe landing condition. The Captain operating must always follow the ground controller’s instructions, but he can call for his own “go-around” if he thinks danger might lurk. These “Fly Around” acts are daily routine activities.


16 posted on 04/05/2018 6:55:31 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX (Defeat both the Republican (e) & Democrat (e) political parties....Forever!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

Fuel is always low, so a previous flight might have cut it too short. The turn around might have been a change in runway direction.


17 posted on 04/05/2018 6:57:10 AM PDT by CodeToad (The Democrats haven't been this pissed off since the Republiverycans took their slaves away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: budj

I do trust the Pilot was doing the right thing assuming there was no screw up initially. However, it would have been nice if he had let us know why he had to essentially abort the landing, pull up, change directions, etc. He said nothing. The plane was pretty quiet. THats when the guy next to me said “the copilot must be flying this thing.” ....I Like when the pilot keeps us informed on developments. Thanks.


18 posted on 04/05/2018 6:57:40 AM PDT by vespa300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

DFW is a huge airport, once I asked the flight attendant while we were taxiing “Are we driving to Albuquerque?”


19 posted on 04/05/2018 6:58:01 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flash Bazbeaux

>>>The pilot made this announcement, and then corrected himself, saying “They’re actually turning the traffic pattern around, the runways are staying the way they are”. We then went out over the Pacific and landed. Sounds like that’s what happened to you.>>>

Our pilot said nothing. Sounds like you had the kind of pilot I prefer. Thanks.


20 posted on 04/05/2018 6:58:59 AM PDT by vespa300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson