Well, how would you prefer that I disagree?
It is not possible. You are too feminine and into posturing yourself in a position of avoiding personal responsibility and reproach , instead of
detaching your centers of concerns and emotionally from the subject to discuss it objectively. You strategize yourself instead of discussing the issues and datas, calling it nutty.
Surely all women are individual, but the feminine and masculine are words that mean something. Most women and “men” who say all people are unique are in fact not making this a statement about the world (whose data recurences they avoid and really want to know nothing about) but about how they want to be on that angel cloud away from controvercies in a world away when in fact there are many on such cloud.
I suppose it is not censorship to be on a glamorous cloud away from hearing the plebes who fix street lighting, but it is not exactly polite disagreement either. Let us not confuse polite with “quiet disagreement”
In fact the feminine emotional center is so strong, it becomes impossible to convey good advice to some women about how to REALLY stand out from all the other chicks and their strategies that a rich man has had his wealth allowing him abilities to meet them often and count them often , recurences and all, words that come back etc... all this complicated chick stuff he has however had heard before. If very masculine he will just dull it out and become cynical predictably, and if he has some feminine traits, well, he might make nice paintings or write better books than 50 Shades or They Must Serve Beer in Hell