Q Anon: (3/28/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

we-go-all.com/# ^ | 3/28/2018 | FReepers, Vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:

http://www.we-go-all.com/#

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

I think the following video provides a "big picture" view of why "the storm" is necessary.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link: Email support for President Trump

[reasonisfaith]

Speaking of personalities, yours does not do well with mine.

For the most part I’m the logical, serious, abstract thinker with slight paranoid tendencies. You come across as the emotional, histrionic attention seeker whose narcissistic temperament sets your retaliatory impulse on a hair trigger. Hence your post #1513.

We don’t do well because your need for attention confuses me, at times setting off my paranoia, and things go downhill from there.

[reasonisfaith]

All I can think of is I was touched that you sent me a private email.

[zzeeman]

My point of view is that Limbaugh is authorized dissent.

Indeed!

[defconw]

Rush must have been teasing. I am sure at least one of his researchers had to have mentioned Q to him by now.

[Cboldt]

aslin posts prety good size chunks of Limbaugh transcripts, fairly soon after they are available. Search FR by Keyword: rush

[MayflowerMadam]

I was listening to that. Rush’s “I don’t no nuthin’” attitude about Q Anon is a front. A couple weeks ago a caller brought it up, and he said then that he’d never heard of it. So maybe he doesn’t know a lot about it, but he HAS heard of it.

[Cboldt]

-- I thought I read that they got some previously redacted stuff in custody. Obviously coverup, not redaction. Now I'm confused. --

I think there are two different justifications involved, and each justification feeds a different argument or theory.

Some are of a mind that the Page/Strzok love affair is pure fiction, and as the sole point of evidence, they cite a total absence of lovey messages. That observation is also explained if the DOJ withheld all the purely personal messages.

Of the messages that are not withheld, there are likely portions redacted at least from the public. I would take those as protecting either classified information or ongoing investigations.

[bagster]

I say let Rush say Q all day long.

Q anecdote time and relevantly on topic. Surprise: So my good son is 25 and for some reason listens to the conservative channel here, Rush, Hannity, etc. I turned him on to Drudge for starter material and it pings to his phone with breaking stuff.

I tried Q on him and I guess I mistakenly gave him the kookoobird version cause he laughed at me. ME! Me who made him. I want him to hear Rush say Q just one time while he's listening. This could possibly be the keystone to unlocking the entire mellenial generation and bringing them over to us. He has a lot of friends. He really does.

Seriously. Rush and Roseanne. That's mainstream, people. Well, Roseanne anyway. More and More. Q will be on every lip. We must increase our efforts. I red pilled a guy yesterday that was over selling me a patio. Probably in his thirties or late twenties.

Fresno is mine, and soon the entire central valley. California will fall. Then up the coast to the other hippie states. Together we move west and meet you guys in the middle.

Saddle up sidewinders!!!!

For tonight...WE RIDE!!!!!!!

Nap time.

[Cboldt]

-- I thought I read that they got some previously redacted stuff in custody. --

On reading that, I wonder if you are thinking of the 50,000 that were missing. Cough cough.

[Aquamarine]

Wish they would hurry up and make some high profile arrests so we could stop eating our own.

[reformedliberal]

I’m pretty sure Florida voter registration data by county/party is somewhere on line. I’ve bumped into it when looking up old friends who moved to FL. Ages are usually there, too. Just put in the name (middle or middle initial helps)and whatever address you have, even if it’s only county/state. You might even see the relevant data on the search return page.

[bagster]

50mil people b itchin about how nothing’s happened yet.

Or another 50 million corlordes. :)

Bright side. Another 50 million ME's!!!!

[bagster]

Yea. Yea. Missing. Thanks, Miss Manners. :)

[meyer]

Nap well, napster,.... err, Bagster.
Night shift is soon upon us.

[Cboldt]

-- I say let Rush say Q all day long. --

He's gonna do what he's gonna do.

His program is influential. But he is quite careful about not stepping directly on deep state toes. He'll play according to the templates advanced by the press, for the most part. There is TONS of room for dissent in that playground.

Limbaugh never got down in the weeds on OKC, Waco, Ruby Ridge, or a host of toher events where it is pretty clear the government was "dealing dirty," to put it mildly.

I figure he'll do a sort of admit it (Q) is there, but is in the nature of a LARP - in his own words, of course. Acknowledge, but try to discourage serious interest.

[JockoManning]

Thanks for your very touching encouragement. Rather needed today. I find you rather likeable, too. Thanks for being here and for being you.

[reformedliberal]

Speaking of FBI (I was looking for a post to spring off of):
I caught bits of Hannity’s radio show in the first hour. Didn’t catch who he was speaking with, since I was vacuuming, but the person stated that “Past predicts future” is an element in FBI criminal training (& perhaps Military Intelligence/Military Police?). Means a person’s past will give good indications about what future acts they will commit.

Sorry if I’m the last person to find this out, but I’ve never seen it spelled out this way before.

[bagster]

Also, been thinking about the Strok, some girl affair thing. People are surprised there are no affectionate convo texts recovered and thinking that it means they weren't having an affair for that reason.

I say hold on a sec. I have engaged in a workplace romance, even bedded and wedded one. Once the sexual harassment phase had advanced to the boning phase, we became secretive, and we weren't even married to other people. A workplace affair is usually not talked about openly in a law enforcement environment, even more so when one or both of the parties are married.

I put it to you that they took great care not to show attention to each other at work, like me and my ex did. And they, being FBI, knew better than to act like dipshits on their company phones or at work. Maybe they kept personal phones for that, or maybe they kept it in their pantaloons at work. Most likely both.

So I do not disregard the affair's existence. Somebody got the info from somewhere. Unless it was totally made up out of nothing for the purposes some have stated.

I don't even know why it's so important to know if they were having an affair other than to show the closeness of their relationship for some reason or to embarrass them.

That's my rant on the subject. Other rants may differ.

[JockoManning]

It might help to construe bagster as a cross between

--a {can't think of those Starwars short teddy-bear type people};
--gollum;
--a whirling dervish;
and an
--ADHD plagued kangaroo


with a dash of Machiavelli thrown in for some obnoxiously fiesty spice.

[Chuckster]

Nah. He’s just having’ fun.