Sheer idiocy, but illustrative of the "equal outcome" mindset of the Left.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: Simon Green
2 posted on
03/18/2018 6:32:00 PM PDT by
nwrep
To: Simon Green
3 posted on
03/18/2018 6:33:47 PM PDT by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: Simon Green
Something like this was done in one of the Scandinavian countries. I seem to remember Norway, but maybe it was one of the others.
Some rather rich guy was hit with a speeding ticket that worked out to over $100K.
Ridiculous.
To: Simon Green
No equality under the law for you!
5 posted on
03/18/2018 6:34:14 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=800>https://i.imgur.com/zXSEP5Z.gif)
To: Simon Green
They tried, maybe still do this, in some places in Europe. If I recall correctly the same ticket ranged from dollars to hundreds of thousands of dollars. This is simply another attempt at redistribution and is unconstitutional. Then again, maybe put those idiot ticket writing traffic cams on the roads into and out of the uber rich neighborhoods?
6 posted on
03/18/2018 6:34:23 PM PDT by
Reno89519
(Americans Are Dreamers, Too! No to Amnesty, Yes to Catch-and-Deport, and Yes to E-Verify.)
To: Simon Green
7 posted on
03/18/2018 6:34:52 PM PDT by
21twelve
To: Simon Green
And the rich should pay $150.00 for a loaf of bread and the janitor should pay $.50.
These people are NUTS !!!!!
.
9 posted on
03/18/2018 6:37:19 PM PDT by
Mears
To: Simon Green
Why should a millionaire Wall Street hedge fund manager pay the same as a subway strap hanger for a copy of the NYT?
10 posted on
03/18/2018 6:37:36 PM PDT by
Sgt_Schultze
(When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
To: Simon Green
This is making a case for having White Men pay a lot and every other group pay very little.
To: Simon Green
So much for equal protection under the law. Next: should women with big racks pay the same as a woman with buck teeth? Give judges discretion and there’ll be no limit to silliness.
12 posted on
03/18/2018 6:38:22 PM PDT by
Spok
("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
To: Simon Green
So much for equal protection under the law. Next: should women with big racks pay the same as a woman with buck teeth? Give judges discretion and there’ll be no limit to silliness.
13 posted on
03/18/2018 6:38:27 PM PDT by
Spok
("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
To: Simon Green
Why have traffic fines at all? If they wanted equality, instead of a fine make the punishment either jail time or community service.
15 posted on
03/18/2018 6:38:36 PM PDT by
eastforker
(All in, I'm all Trump,what you got!)
To: Simon Green
“From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs”: Karl Marx.
16 posted on
03/18/2018 6:39:17 PM PDT by
yarddog
To: Simon Green
The nurse should pay more.
She knew she couldn’t afford the ticket, but challenged Law Enforcement anyway.
17 posted on
03/18/2018 6:39:44 PM PDT by
Eddie01
(I'll learned it on Free Republic same as you)
To: Simon Green
This makes no sense- it’s like charging a guy $11,000 for a quarter pounder and fries just because he has more money.
Using this logic, if a poor guy murders a rich gal, he’d get a $10 fine, but if a rich guy does it he’s get the death penalty.
Either way she’s the same corpse.
18 posted on
03/18/2018 6:43:07 PM PDT by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
To: Simon Green
Equality before the law, IS the American dream.
19 posted on
03/18/2018 6:43:51 PM PDT by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: Simon Green
For a justice system committed to treating like offenders alike, scaling fines to income is a matter of basic fairness...maybe in the world you live in, Alec, but not in this one - in the US, we say that all people are equal under the law - regardless of sex, class, race or even wealth - the punishment is set according to the crime, and not the status of the individual (except of course Democrats, who are never guilty of anything to begin with) - in terms you might better understand, you do the crime, you do the time, no matter how little money you have......
To: Simon Green
The differential comes out in the value of the person’s time wasted with a revenue collection agent.
21 posted on
03/18/2018 6:45:28 PM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Number of arrested coup conspirators to date: 0)
To: Simon Green
My opinion: The author needs to be put in a straight jacket and housed in a padded cell.
Entirely and only my opinion.
22 posted on
03/18/2018 6:46:01 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Simon Green
Right. I think that police should be able to pull up your tax returns, pension and bank accounts. Fits right in with civil asset forfeiture.
So what if my chauffeur does the speeding?
23 posted on
03/18/2018 6:46:34 PM PDT by
grumpygresh
(Abolish administrative law. It's regressive, medieval and unconstitutional!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson