Posted on 03/16/2018 7:38:19 PM PDT by ransomnote
This is a shout out to all the Anons who have worked so hard for months on the Q boards to bake Q's drops for us. THANQ, Anons!.
The Q team doesn't like it when they receive praise, but hey, they don't have time to read websites (FR) and besides, they can't stop me!
THANQ, Q!!!!
It just needed to be said.
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3639519/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. Its to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. Ill put the link to their general Youtube channel here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3639029/posts?page=23#23
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon
Also, reportedly, Twitter switched over a year ago to putting the negative/nasty replies at the top of the list of responses to his tweets.
I doubt all her court history is erased. Case files, in courts, tend to persist except through disaster and war.
That said, don't buy, not for one second, that lawyers are detached from their clients. The reason for conflict management is because lawyers are attached to their clients, and can't be trusted to act adverse to their interests, EVER.
Former FDA commissioner Margaret Hamburg named in massive conspiracy and racketeering lawsuit [Levaquin] - April 22, 2016
Ties back to Clinton Foundation ... "the lawsuit alleges that Margaret Hamburg bribed her way into the top position at the FDA by making large financial contributions to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama."
Q sets RR [Rosenstein] as a black hat:
I see no way any of these people can be trusted. Whether they keep their post or not depends on whether the damage they intend to cause can be contained. Not much of a limb to predict that Rosenstein's days as DAG are numbered.
Draining the swamp was never going to be easy. Organizations resist downsizing with all their might.
I noticed that "ready made" thing too. He's had at least a few days to anticipate the inevitable, and he isn't otherwise engaged, so not a shocker. The "get Trump" determination is persistent. What isn;t really clear is how widespread it is. Is it 20% of the government, or 50%, or 80%? I think it is way more than half, and that these people have no principles. They have to be caught red handed, and even then they will deny.
You think youre being clever. You arent. You are just trolling. You show zero insight at all about the Q drops to even start trying to ridicule or parody them.
@[19][1st]
>The 19 that met in the WH
>First Amendment violations.
>From Q Post 541 . . . What [19] people are currently meeting in a 'safe' room [heavily guarded]? (18 Jan at 9:30pm)
>From Q post 617 [19] immediates [no longer with us]. (27 Jan)
@[3][1st]
>Google, Twitter, YouTube (Facebook?)
>From Q Post [3] https:// www.globaleaks.org
> First Amendment violations.
The LINK
>MSM
Snowden
CIA
[John Perry Barlow]
> Barlow already wrote the internet Bill of Rights
[2]Former O-senior officials
>1.James Comey
>2. Loretta Lynch
[3]Senators
>1. One we don't Name
>2. Chuck Schumer
>3,
[4] OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS (MSM traitors)
>1. Anderson Cooper
>2. Jim Acosta
>3. Chris Matthews ?
>4.Morning Joe? Chris Cuomo?
>From Q Post REAL TIME: [7] Congressional members + [3] Senators + [2] former O-senior officials + [4] OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS [NO C/TOP/SENS-LEVEL CLEARANCE] @ SCIF [DC-CAP].
The date of Q post 541 regarding [19] was 18 January late evening. Q's next sentence in that post stated . . . Why did everyone leave their phones/all other electronic devices in Room 239?. Thinking this anon knew that room number was associated to the White House.
These people no longer with us posted 27 Jan. Who was fired from White House or elsewhere? in that time period??
Andrea Mitchell was begging for someone to hire him on the 14th, I guess so he could keep his pension.
I didn’t see the date at first, ransomnote pointed it out.
You understand Barsoomian was a government lawyer working on cases assigned to her, right?
She is still a government lawyer and works for the National Institutes of Health.
There is still time.
Yeah you are right, but who would be that stupid? LoL
Besides Andrea? Mourning Jo, Mika, the crew at CNN ... oh, in the government?
I mentally went though a short lost. State? Nope. CIA? Nope. EPA? Nope. Energy? Nope.
I suspect Andrea's wish is literally impossible, even if some agency was willing - which makes it "par for news."
If they were knowingly operating in furtherance of an illegal enterprise, then yes, they are operating criminally. Say, approaching Sinaloa and offering to handle their encrypted communications through their company using these modified Blackberry Android phones for an especially high fee due to the knowledge the information being transmitted was to further the exchange of illegal and contraband substances, definitely illegal.
Well I guess he will just have to rely on his go fund me account which might be up to $200 now. ;-)
I also recommend donating to the ACLU and Stormy Daniels.
Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World” certainly was spot-on with his vision predicting the soft overthrow of our Republic with its’ 3-step process to totalitarian control:
1. Socialist Government health care (to control the masses)
2. Socialist welfare (to have masses depend on government hand-outs)
3. Flood masses with drugs/opiates to keep masses doped-up
Well I’ll have to think about that one.... I asked Inky and he said Nope not gonna happen.
Digger, Snickers, Milo and Sunny concur. Ivan is still pondering.
The SOB is worth something like 11 mil. How does one make that in a gov’t gig? Legally I mean.
He and his wife, right?
Opposing Trump is lucrative.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.