Q Anon: (3/16/18) Continued from Tuesday's thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

we-go-all.com/# ^ | 3/16/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This is a shout out to all the Anons who have worked so hard for months on the Q boards to bake Q's drops for us. THANQ, Anons!.

The Q team doesn't like it when they receive praise, but hey, they don't have time to read websites (FR) and besides, they can't stop me!

THANQ, Q!!!!
It just needed to be said.

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3639519/posts

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:

http://www.we-go-all.com/#

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3639029/posts?page=23#23

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

[saywhatagain]

I did not do a complete search, but the use of Military Tribunals are "implied." And yes, implied does not make it so. The use of tribunals is mostly found in the "conversations" surrounding the posts.

Post 619 is interesting in its meaning and tribunals being "implied"

I post in more than a needed for some context. I always think its a good idea to back and read old posts again and again to gain more insight and understanding. I agree, the idea of Military Tribunals has some uncomfortable connotations. Will see

Q Post #619

Note the last drops on the other board.
Think logically.
Refer to past crumbs
. YOU HAVE MORE THAN YOU KNOW.
Do you expect HRC, GS, Hussein, etc to stand in a PUBLIC courtroom w/
potential
crooked judges and tainted ‘liberal’ juries?
How do you defuse a bomb?
Knowledge of which wires/strings to cut?
Q

Q Post #4 and part repeated in Post #6

POTUS will not be addressing nation on any of these issues as
people begin to be indicted and must remain neutral for pure
optical reasons. To suggest this is the plan is false and should
be common sense.
Focus on Military Intellingence/ State Secrets and why might
that be used vs any three letter agency
What SC decision opened the door for a sitting President to
activate - what must be showed?

Q Post #11 and repeated in part (small part)

Key:
Military Intelligence v FBI CIA NSA
No approval or congressional oversight
State Secrets upheld under SC
Who is the Commander and Chief of the military?
Under what article can the President impose MI take over
investigations for the 3 letter agencies? What conditions must
present itself? Why is this so VERY important? Who surrounds POTUS? They lost

this very important power _ the one area of the govt not corrupt and
directly serves POTUS.

Another clue in Q Post 23 in reference to CIA outposts

[Steven W.]

That's not just a tidbit: Edward Snowden: Facebook is a surveillance company rebranded as 'social media'

Former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden ripped Facebook in a tweet Saturday after the social media giant suspended Cambridge Analytica, a data analytics firm which worked worked for President Trump’s campaign.

[Publius]

It’s a hint that Snowden is in a safe place.

[Steven W.]

The / one connotation is that the tribunal is the (only) way for mil to investigate rogue (seditious) agencies.

[Bodleian_Girl]

I could see Twitter manipulation when I read back over the thread today, but last night in real time it was the shoot out at the OK Corral and our side was winning.

[reformedliberal]

SO:

1) Hillary originally has a sprain on the hand she used to catch her step slip. Possible.

2) Hillary then is diagnosed with a ‘hairline fracture’ (distinctive diagnosis to explain how this was missed on the 1st go-around). Possible.

3) Hillary is seen with the sleeve extended to totally hide her hand and wrist.

4) No sling. Is she hiding the fact that she did not injure the wrist? But then, she could pretend with a sling. Or an air cast. Slings aren’t essential, but they are more comfortable, initially, and elevate the limb for the first few days. In any event, she displayed her orthopedic boot. Why not display her cast? Her wide sleeve would slide right over it, anyway.

5) Hillary is *advised* to not fly while she *heals*. (What about a fractured wrist would preclude flying in a private plane? The possibility of a blood clot? From a *hairline* fracture?)Any clinicians out there have an answer? I once cracked a metatarsal and there was a bruise from internal bleeding.

6) Did she have a seizure? That would rule out flying for a while.

Nothing is ever straight forward with these people.

[txhurl]

This is how your Snowden tidbit article ends:

Snowden was granted asylum in Russia back in 2013 after he leaked secret information from the National Security Agency’s surveillance programs and has been there ever since.

lol

[saywhatagain]

Am thinking that issue alone . . . is the reason for the use of tribunals. Repeated 1,000 times, corruption too deep in all agencies. Which make sense to me. Growing up we knew communist factor were infiltrating our government. Last 10 to 12 years never heard once (maybe a little about Muslim Brotherhood) bad actors infiltrating our government. Its got to be deep.

[xone]

ph

[missthethunder]

“I could see Twitter manipulation when I read back over the thread today, but last night in real time it was the shoot out at the OK Corral and our side was winning.”

That is great.

[Bigg Red]

Sounds like a worthwhile idea, but I would not be your girl for that. Not a fan. Don’t know squat about the Dead.

[Bigg Red]

:)

(Insert graphic here of Trump dressed as Wyatt Earp. ....If only this old lady had some tech skills....)

[missthethunder]

The live chat was just talking about Military jets flying over LA.

Anybody seeing Military jets circling LA?

I did go out and look and did see some jets
but I live in a flight path.

I’m going to go back out and watch to see if I can tell
it they are circling.

[little jeremiah]

I think there are fewer drones than the MSM/pinkos are trying to make us think via Fake Media, astroturfing crap and so on. That’s why they have to increasingly censor twatter, youtube and so on.

[hoosiermama]

Also in flight path. Nothing unusual here in fly over country

[Bigg Red]

I don’t know how to post the picture, but here’s the link to the page that has it:

https://lovewillbringustogether.wordpress.com/2017/04/07/theres-a-new-sheriff-in-town/

[Bigg Red]

I don’t know how to post the picture, but here’s the link to the page that has it:

https://lovewillbringustogether.wordpress.com/2017/04/07/theres-a-new-sheriff-in-town/

[little jeremiah]

What SC decision opened the door for a sitting President to activate - what must be showed?

Under what article can the President impose MI take over investigations for the 3 letter agencies? What conditions must present itself?

Anyone know the answers to these questions? What conditions must present itself: maybe insurrection, widespread rioting with deaths, etc? Or states in rebellion such as CA practically is?

[TrueFact]

The Fox promo was just video and music no speaking. So you’re not missing anything with no sound.

[Bigg Red]

Thanks. I saw a story about that a few days ago.