I pointed LS to this article and his comment was "not a single named source"...
Good point on LS' part. It's a positive piece of information, but suspect at this point in time. Verification needed.
I pointed LS to this article and his comment was “not a single named source”...
**********************************************************
Who is LS? Why should I care? NY Times, Washington Post, the majority of LSM never has a single named source.
Maybe the sources prefer to be secret to avoid Arkancide.