Posted on 03/12/2018 12:17:08 AM PDT by ransomnote
Don’t let the bickering run you off. You’re doing well by ignoring it, and I hope others follow suit.
My opinion is that the trolls might want to discourage people from looking at these threads for some reason. I don’t think it’s for sport or play myself.
One more note...we can’t see the fallen angels either though they’re here as well. (Satan/demon possession, we are legion etc.)
Very interesting re: Las Vegas. I have been claiming that it’s a major cover-up since day one. Nothing in the “official” story matches up. Just too much evidence that things didn’t go as they claimed.
I know that a few are investigating it pretty vigorously, and I’d love to see the whole truth come out.
That was pretty amusing right? Don’t think anyone on this thread can see us OR maybe we are just flat out being ignored.
What say you?
I have always had lousy "facial recognition circuitry". For a few seconds I actually thought the man in black might be "CLFK" (my "pet" "Crazy Little Fat Kid" acronym for Kim Jong Un).
But, then, I spotted the little red flags with gold stars. The DPRK flag has a lone red star in a white circle on a red field -- which has white & blue upper and lower edges. It's the Chinese flag that is red, with gold stars.
The point of this exercise is that we need lots of eyes & brains looking at these video frames. Everyone can help!
Some of the skill sets we need are:
No sign-ons needed. just follow along, look at the imagery, ask yourself questions -- and tell us when you think you may have an insight!
~~~~~~~
Back to the image drudgery for me, for now...
I pointed LS to this article and his comment was "not a single named source"...
It’s Xi Jinping.
Inspiring post! I might add that photo was probably illegally taken in the Forbidden City. Too much candor.
Well, that sounds horrible.
Suppose, for instance, that the non-eligible officer committed massive crimes, and is arrested for those crimes. Of course, this whole situation is unprecedented, but how do you think that might affect the outcome?
And add to that the fact that many others conspired with him to commit criminal fraud so he could get elected?
OMGosh that was Q in the hat at the end wasn’t it?
Hey did you know that in Q #904
DhytcDFbF5874/37875 = IDEALISTS INVALIDED ?
Really it’s true!
Good point on LS' part. It's a positive piece of information, but suspect at this point in time. Verification needed.
It’s no fun for a troll to have to reply only to himself.
Hey SM, lookit this excellent casting call by txnma. Skillset RFP.
That's a different matter. He can be prosecuted for any criminal acts.
But the fact that e.g. Bill Clinton was in fact a criminal did not render his official acts invalid. Same would be true if he was ineligible to hold office.
-- And add to that the fact that many others conspired with him to commit criminal fraud so he could get elected? --
Same as for the principal. If Pelosi falsified documents to secretaries of state, she's likely committed a crime, although each state has it's own criminal laws on points like that.
If a person is elected based on fraud to the public, the general rule is that the official acts stand even though the fraud is discovered and corrected. It's up to the public, not the courts, to run an honest system.
Hmmmm. No boot, walking freely abroad promoting her business, Huma in tow. Doesn’t appear anything is really happening to our band of felonious females.
I agree
In the context, it's likely that "subgroup" = SS = MS13
Nephilim World Order ?
Great post!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.