Posted on 03/12/2018 12:17:08 AM PDT by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3638382/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:
http://qanon.pub
Some people have difficulty accessing that Q drop page and prefer to use the following link:
http://www.we-go-all.com/#
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3638382/posts?page=2000#2000
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
Here’s an argument that I could not settle with my math/algebra teacher many many years ago. I was told that no matter what number you times by “zero”, the answer is “zero”. So I asked the teacher to explain. If I am holding a nickel in my hand and you “times” that nickel by “zero”, how can the answer be “zero” when I still have the nickel in my hand? I flunked a lot of tests, lol.
What's that you say? You remember Bauer being Obama's White House Counsel? Why would Barry need one of the country's foremost election specialist attorneys, who's written books on the subject?
Later, Bauer was appointed to head a CIA panel. Without experience and all the clearances necessary, you muse? Bzzzzzzt!
Teacher - "Now you have zero. Would you like to try addition?"
Is not Jimmy Carter still alive? Old and searching for a way out? Sleeper?
There's some worthy cautions in your words.
HOWEVER, if your exhortations re evidence are strictly followed, the main result will be a huge amount, percentage of false negative errors.
IT IS NOT LOGICAL or practical that highly secret things are going to present lots of laboratory level proof.
It is absolutely ONLY possible for such information initially to appear via rumor, leaks, nuance etc. etc. etc.
It may be risky to fairly consider it but there is no other alternative and only fools ignore it automatically and totally.
Qx has called them REGRESSIVES all along—regressing us back to satan worshiping Babylon.
First, take this alegbraic equality:
a + b = c
Then, subsitute "4a - 3a" for "a", and "4b - 3b" for "b":
4a - 3a + 4b - 3b = 4c - 3c
Then move "-3a" on the left to "+3a" on the right, and
move "4c" on the right to "-4c" on the left:
4a + 4b - 4c = 3a + 3b - 3c
Then use the distributive property to isolate common factors on each side:
4(a + b - c) = 3(a + b - c)
4 = 3
have you checked out the link on the top right side “q related news” doesn’t look like it’s been updated since jan but lots of info..
Yep, checked it out.
I think the answer comes to 0 = 0.
ahh..nice. “777 - Why was Blackberry destroyed? “
Also, George Webb has many vids about the blackberries and the Awans and Congress - seems blackberries are critical to the various espionage activities.. pakis might have been siphoning info from all congressional intelligence committees for YEARS.. and we apparently have no right to know what has been done about this.. /s
When you don’t have actual evidence to back up claims, the first instinct is to not allow discussion of the veracity of claims.
In you have actual evidence to back up claims, you welcome questions and criticism as you are then given an opening to show the evidence that led to your conclusions.
Sorry defconw That 3939 was a typo by me. I somehow added it the end of post and explained it in a post right after.
FBI INSIDERS BLOW WHISTLE ON LAS VEGAS EVENTS
FBI Insiders Blow Whistle on Massive Las Vegas Cover Up; Agents Told Not to Investigate Key Evidence Including ISIS Terror Link to Mandalay Bay Massacre
Posted on March 12, 2018 by Investigative Bureau
The “official” narrative you’ve been fed by the FBI and Las Vegas officials about the massacre at Mandalay Bay that claimed 58 lives is purely fiction, a polished story contrived to cover up the disturbing facts surrounding the worst mass shooting ever in the United States, according the FBI insiders and high-ranking intelligence officials.And now, after months of corporate-infused spin by MGM Resorts and outright lies from officials in the FBI and the Las Vegas Metro Police Department, federal agents and intelligence officials are spilling the beans about what really happened on and before the Oct. 1 massacre.
“It’s a movie script that was written after the shooting to rewrite what really happened,” one FBI agent said. “The investigation is an entirely different story that we are not allowed to talk about. If we do and get caught, we get fired and probably charged (criminally).”
But why the cover up?
The answer to that is perhaps even more complicated than the revelations surrounding the shooting, which can only be explained as shocking and troubling to everyday Americans not connected to the law enforcement community and political machine that has become today’s FBI. While few if any bright Americans believed the official back story of the supposed Stephen Paddock rampage, the truth — it turns out — is even more bizarre than fiction here.
In fact, it’s downright frightening.
The FBI maintains that Stephen Paddock — the reported lone gunman — was a mystery man and his motive for killing dozens and injuring over 500 people still has not been pinpointed. Those assertions are simply untrue, FBI officials confirm. Lies. In the coming weeks, True Pundit will detail various parts of its investigation into the shooting and more importantly, paint a detailed portrait of the events leading to the shooting and Paddock’s likely accomplices and associates.
The major, shocking revelations include:
When FBI brass was provided with forensic evidence of multiple gunmen, they told agents to stand down and focus on Paddock only. Even a key internal audio captured by a hotel guest of multiple rifles firing from Mandalay Bay went ignored, covered up.
When FBI brass was provided the names of persons of interest who likely assisted Paddock, agents were instructed not to interview the individuals. One would-be target was never pursued despite pleadings from intelligence officials and agents that he was possibly the second shooter.
The FBI uncovered specific evidence showing that Paddock was anti-Trump and had an affiliation with ANTIFA, though it never was divulged to the public and agents did not follow such leads, per orders of their superiors.
When FBI brass was given evidence that the shooting was possibly linked to ANTIFA radicals working with an ISIS-linked terror faction — including the full identities of some of the suspects with ties to both radical groups and at or near Mandalay Bay the night of the deadly shooting — agents were never instructed to follow up on the investigation and pursue the suspects.
When intelligence officials approached the FBI and LVMPD with external evidence that Paddock was only one member of an organized terror cell — which included as many as five gunman who planned to fire from the Mandalay Bay suite — the compelling evidence was covered up. Never pursued.
. . .
Thank you. It gets wearying that so many worship mindlessly at a purported pristine lock solid level of laboratory quality “PROOF.”
Following strictly and only some sorts of evidence, Columbo nor Perry Mason would have never cracked a case.
It could only launch an ICBM from a towed launcher and it’s also a diesel without the range (unless it was towed itself and picked up the towable launcher).
Noooooooooooooooooooooo! Missed it by that much! LOL
I carry that prayer in my purse. Don’t say it as often as I should. I will make it a part of my daily prayers again. Our country is being attacked by dark, evil forces.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.