Who left me feeling like:
Posted on 03/12/2018 12:17:08 AM PDT by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3638382/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:
http://qanon.pub
Some people have difficulty accessing that Q drop page and prefer to use the following link:
http://www.we-go-all.com/#
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3638382/posts?page=2000#2000
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
Look again. You weren't in the "To" box.
Derp.
Damn my eyes!!!
I'm simply pointing out that you may not be the perfect arbiter of what is "snowflake BS". I'm certainly not arrogant enough to believe that I am...
I am, and I am.
:)
I see that as one of the biggest problems that has hindered the effort, and if it continues, it will become worse.
Especially in how expectations are being set for events that may or may not happen, on a given date, or ever.
Recently we have seen swarms of momentum built up about a particular type of video (or another particular type of video) being released yesterday (3/11) or perhaps on 3/15.
Of course a lot of this is to be expected within a model in which information and data is given out (largely) in the form of clues that people are encouraged to research and put together. However, without applying strict discipline to the effort, it is inevitable that the "answers" being peddled all over the Internet are going to be far afield (and often damaging to the original intent).
As we all can see, people all over the Internet are quickly posting their latest theories and conclusions 24 hours each day. Some of them are well meaning in their motivation, some are not. Some are striving to maintain a level of discipline and let their conclusions be guided by where the clues and research lead them, and some are using this exercise to mold the conclusions to support their pet theories and beliefs.
Of course we can't control what is being created out on all reaches of the Internet, but we can control the quality and tenor of the FR "Q" threads. I have seen some really fantastic posts in these threads based on FReepers examining the actual content and context of various Q posts, and putting forth some well reasoned opinions on the possible meaning(s) of the posts. Others provide detailed analysis of video or images and tether them to other data points of information; these are fantastic work efforts that should be relished!
But I have also seen wild 'copy and pastes' of anonymous individuals' wild unsubstantiated guesses about things. There are links to blithering idiots on you tube rambling incoherently about things that they have no real clue about.
All that I am saying is that the more we (in these FR Q threads) stick to the actual content and context of the Q posts, while bringing in data and information that is verified (at least to the point of the source being validated as a real human being or entity), the better quality our research will be (and we will be less guilty of setting expectations for others that are merely warm desires).
And when we introduce content from "the wild" it may help if we include our own comments regarding what we know (or don't know) of the source, supporting data/information, and its relationship to the larger picture.
Just my two cents, I'd had to see this effort dashed upon the rocks by a constant stream of wishful thinking that never comes to pass.
What are they hiding? Who are they protecting? Was it a sting gone wrong?
Stop feeding the troll.
I don’t know that there is a way forward without it though.
Maybe he got what he wanted quicker than he thought it would take
I like to think I can look at a wide variety of information, even from "kookoo birds" and suss out what truths I can determine.
We are all adults here.
We must armor ourselves against the accusations of "conspiracy theory" that come our way. Eff em, I say.
Risk of ‘conspiracy’ label the deeper we go.
Truth will shock the WORLD.
:)
The acid test here is false flags and whether you believe they happen or not. If not, skip to the next post.
If so, then every time one happens with the intent of drawing us into war or emotional legislation to restrict the Bill of Rights guarantees, if we instantly kill and/or incapacitate the perpetrators, eventually false flags will end. If the perps coincidentally share ancient DNA, that’s their Thanksgiving problem, not ours.
Deep state administrations knee-jerk to false flags, notice CINC hasn’t *truly* knee-jerked to the above-average-horrific FFs since his inaug. He’s hopefully writing liens to sieze their global assets if not killing them outright.
Haha. Tell 'em.
At least we know where all the cowgirls are. :)
Totally believe.
Eggerberg, Switzerland no longer listed at all. At least 8 pages in.
I forgot to add, follow the money!
He will lose me too if he embraces the views of the Holocaust deniers. Shortly after his Israel post, He posted w video BY an admiral who is very pro survival of the state of Israel. I think (hope) Q saw where this was heading and that is how he tried to pull back.
There is no evidence Merkel is related to Hitler. And the anti-Semitism that overtook the 8ch board this weekend was about more than I could stand. Study the history of Jewish persecution folks! We do NOT want to be those people!!!!
Israel is our friend and God’s protectorate. We need to get this one right.
But my concern is less for those of us that are following all of these M-W-F threads post by post, to their eventual retirement, but those that wander in and see one or two posts without understanding the context.
I'd really be disappointed if people walk away drawing a conclusion of: "That fraud Q said such and such was going to happen on {date} and it didn't." When the facts of the matter are that Q said no such thing.
I think that you share that sentiment as well, goodman! :)
Just something to keep the press occupied while the adults continue to drain the swamp, IMHO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.