Posted on 03/12/2018 12:17:08 AM PDT by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3638382/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:
http://qanon.pub
Some people have difficulty accessing that Q drop page and prefer to use the following link:
http://www.we-go-all.com/#
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3638382/posts?page=2000#2000
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
That’s what I’m saying. The holocaust is quite obviously 100% real but deep state will shut you down with the ‘denyer’ label if you question any aspect of their account of HOW it happened, and by exactly WHO.
Adjusted precisely how? You don't think American Patriots "understand" what Nazi Germany was? Where does my "understanding" need to be "adjusted"?
I think most educated Americans of all political persuasions have Nazi Germany pegged pretty damn accurately, and I'm at a loss to see where much "adjustment" would be needed...
Another one for the list. :)
Wells said, sargon.
The Nazi/Catholic Church/Jew posts in 8Chan this weekend were distracting.
I also agree with you regarding using a broad brush.
I am interested to see what Q will post next just to see if he ‘pulls back’ from this conversation all together.
One thing I did consider was Tillerson’s trip to Kenya last week. First he had to cancel some events because he was not feeling well. Now he is headed back, cutting the trip short. A ‘pull back’?
ph
Yeah I think for longtime followers of the Q posts we can redirect pretty easily, but IMO I think for people that Q was new to the whole Nazi rabbit hole was a pretty damaging direction...not how you want to expand the storm.
Myself personally while following the Merkel/Nazi/Hitler posts this weekend was even saying “oh come on” I’m not dismissing it, but I’m not ready to go there yet.
We live in a now world right now and if at all possible Q should try to keep it as close to that as possible...attention spans can be made longer in the future once a lot of the current actions take place.
I guess so, unless I've missed something. Hence my comment about people "filling in the blanks" with their own pet opinions or theories. But such things are certainly appearing from somewhere, and it's not all just Deep State shenaigans—there are also some true believers, unfortunately...
But I'm definitely wary of any effort to steer things in such a direction. To me, if that came directly from Q, it would be a yuge red flag, and an indicator that things aren't as they seem.
I remain both receptive to new information, and vigilant against manipulation from any source...
Who originated that theory?
Precisely so, MN.
Missing Argentina submarine vs. Hawaii. Can anybody answer Ben's question better than me?
We are in agreement on that topic, Sargon. :)
That's the kind of smug condescension that is counterproductive and uncalled for.
And sometimes outrage isn't faux, while accusations of "virtue signalling" are.
So at least accept the fact that there can be genuine differences of opinion or interpretation, and when they do appear, treat them as what they are—geniune...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angela_Merkel#Background_and_early_life
p.s. Nutters abound. We can't dismiss an entire movement based on the rantings of the few. Some may be plants as well, intending to discredit. This has been a tactic of the left for some time.
Please keep that in mind. :)
No.
I agree that differences of opinion exist, and I respect that. However, I consider it manipulation when people express outrage over things that should be discussed reasonably and logically.
Opinion and emotion are different things.
If what someone says is snowflake BS I'm going to tell them what they said is snowflake BS.
I'm very politically incorrect and I'm not pampering anybody.
started watching the new Mini series on Hulu called “The Looming Tower” based on the book of the same name, so far it is pretty good but frustrating seeing the missed opportunities and the infighting between the CIA and FBI that led to 9-11
FBI misses a lot...
9-11 Warnings:
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/18/us/traces-of-terrorism-the-warnings-fbi-knew-for-years-about-terror-pilot-training.html
TRACES OF TERRORISM: THE WARNINGS; F.B.I. Knew for Years About Terror Pilot Training
The F.B.I. knew by 1996 of a specific threat that terrorists in Al Qaeda, Mr. bin Laden’s network, might use a plane in a suicide attack against the headquarters of the C.I.A. or another large federal building in the Washington area, the law enforcement officials acknowledged.
http://articles.latimes.com/2001/oct/14/news/mn-57084
Haunted by Years of Missed Warnings
As suspected terrorists traversed the U.S. over a decade, signs pointing to their plans went unheeded until after the attacks were carried out.
Federal authorities also knew that Ramzi Yousef, who masterminded the 1993 truck bombing of the World Trade Center, later planned to blow up 12 United Airlines, Delta Air Lines and Northwest Airlines jumbo jets over the Pacific Ocean. After the plot was uncovered in 1995, a co-conspirator, Abdul Hakim Murad, told police in the Philippines that he had hoped to hijack a passenger plane and crash it into CIA headquarters outside Washington. Murad had attended four U.S. flight schools.
Yet no surveillance was in place to scrutinize aspiring pilots or to raise a warning flag when the men who would eventually hijack four jetliners Sept. 11 trained at flight schools around the country.
Orlando Shooting:
https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2016/06/13/vennochi/MyMQCrKJ4JpasZhgHNPGiO/story.html
FBI missed the warning signs — again
The FBI, under director James Comey, knew about Omar Mateen.
FROM BOSTON, IT sounds very familiar.
Omar Mateen slipped through the hands of federal law enforcement authorities — just like Tamerlan Tsarnaev.
Boston Marathon Bombing:
https://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2013/06/fbi-knew-earlier-of-boston-bombing-suspect-166313
Deceased Boston Marathon bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev came to the attention of the FBI on at least two occasions prior to a Russian government warning in March 2011 that said he appeared to be radicalizing, FBI Director Robert Mueller said in Congressional testimony this week.
The earlier references have led some lawmakers to question whether the FBI acted too quickly in closing an assessment of Tsarnaev’s potential ties to terrorism done in response to the Russian request.
Nairobi Embassy Bombing:
http://www.nytimes.com/1998/10/23/world/nairobi-embassy-received-warning-of-coming-attack.html
NAIROBI EMBASSY RECEIVED WARNING OF COMING ATTACK
Nine months before the attack on the American Embassy here, United States intelligence officials received a detailed warning that Islamic radicals were plotting to blow up the building, according to Kenyan and American officials.
The warning forecast the Aug. 7 bombing in several particulars, the officials said. It came from an Egyptian man who American officials now believe was involved in the simultaneous terrorist assaults on the American Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.
The Egyptian, Mustafa Mahmoud Said Ahmed, is now in jail in Tanzania, charged by local prosecutors with bombing the embassy there.
Cole Bombing:
http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/01/31/cole.intelligence/index.html
Pentagon panel unaware of 1998 warning of ship attack in Yemen.
FBI heard of plot to attack U.S. ship before USS Cole bombing
The Pentagon commission that declared there was no intelligence glitch that left the USS Cole open to attack was unaware that a suspected terrorist had warned the FBI of a plot to attack a U.S. warship in Yemen years before the bombing.
Pentagon officials continued Wednesday to downplay the significance of the warning, noting it was two years old and came from a suspect being questioned in the U.S. Embassy bombing in Kenya who was seeking to make a deal with U.S. authorities.
Parkland Shooting:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/06/politics/fbi-tip-congress-parkland-shooting-florida/index.html
FBI tells House members tips missed ahead of Parkland shooting
Bowdich told lawmakers in a private briefing Tuesday that the FBI had received two tips — one last September and one in January — about the threat that Nikolas Cruz posed to his community in Parkland, Florida, according two sources familiar with the matter. The first tip came following a YouTube post that asserted that Cruz wanted to be a school shooter, something that was directed to a field office in Jackson, Mississippi. The agent in charge of the matter investigated the issue, but that agent was unable to make any headway in the investigation, failing to determine who Cruz was.
I am not advocating this or completely disavowing it either. But given all the lies we have heard. Who really knows?
https://lovetruthsite.wordpress.com/2016/07/27/did-world-war-ii-ever-really-end/
Hey, me too!!! I think we may have been separated at birth. What did I say that you disagree with. Was it the "I respect different opinions" line?
I didn't say that I respect the OPINION but that I respect the fact that there ARE different opinions. Of course all opinions are not equal or right. And I will argue for the truth every chance I get.
Maybe I misspoke? I am often inarticulate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.