To: SkyPilot; TEXOKIE
No, the way that I am reading it (see my last post above) is that an ANON had misunderstood Q's post #903.
Q clarifies it in #905. (It had to do with ES having 24 hours to respond, and apparently he already did, publicly.)
The whole "receivership" thing was just a bad guess.
371 posted on
03/09/2018 3:57:42 PM PST by
zzeeman
("We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality.")
To: zzeeman; SkyPilot; txhurl
I see what you mean, zzeman. And you are probably right.
But until there is more data, I think you can possibly concede that there is room for this other reading.
I got really excited.
Darlin taking me to the pound now.
373 posted on
03/09/2018 4:01:37 PM PST by
TEXOKIE
To: zzeeman
The whole “receivership” thing was just a bad guess.
A very nice guess, but WAY TOO F’N CRAZY just this minute.
Wow. Whoa. Hmm. BTTT.
377 posted on
03/09/2018 4:04:12 PM PST by
txhurl
(The Final Thunderdome: Two Americas enter, One America leaves.)
To: zzeeman
So how did ES (I am assuming Edward Snowden) respond “publicly”?
401 posted on
03/09/2018 4:11:59 PM PST by
Bigg Red
(Francis is a Nincompope.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson