Posted on 03/08/2018 10:41:30 AM PST by SunkenCiv
Is he right-handed or left-handed?
The flipping is not a concern so much as the in-between when the magnetic field is gone. Watched a show that claimed that genetic diversity resulted from the last flip and previous flips. What doesn’t kill you will make your stronger... or more genetically diverse.
Earth’s Pole Has Moved 161 Miles In The Last 6 Months
YouTube | Jun 1, 2013 | uploaded by Mike Smitin
Posted on 06/02/2013 4:52:06 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3026501/posts
Right handed. A mag field is always right-handed.
and still does not deflect from what I asked: Another 5/5/2000 prediction?
Best comment so far. . .
Glory Be, Brothers 'n Sisters !!!
This here means that The SOUTH is Gonna Rise again, fur shore!!
DEO VINDICE !!
Trump’s fault
Well, yeah, it's cold, so it moved south!................
It is because of SUVs and if we send AlGore enough money he will fix it.
Might be quicker and easier to go judge shopping, and get the courts to pass that law.
Southpaw.
It's possible that there are people who still associate magnetic pole shift (which goes on all the time) with a shift of the physical pole. Often enough coverage of these magnetic pole drifts are written up that way by what passes for journalists.
The book "5/5/2000" has more in common with the earlier book "The Jupiter Effect". Both claimed planetary alignments would have direct impact on the Earth's surface (tectonic plates in the Gribbin book, a shift of the physical pole in the Noone book). Neither one turned out to be correct.
I always thought you had to worry about too many Poles on one side of the plane?
Sigh, Africa Wins Again.
I remember the good old days when people realized that the poles shift, and there was the potential to erase video tapes.
Collusion with Pellucidar!
Fossil Mantle Plume Under South America
http://www.science-frontiers.com/sf103/sf103g09.htm
“In a challenge to a major aspect of the theory of plate tectonics, NSF-supported scientists have discovered the presence of an ancient conduit deep in the Earth’s mantle beneath Brazil.
“The conduit appears to have remained geographically fixed with respect to the overlying continent despite thousands of kilometers of South American plate motion. This observation runs contrary to a major tenet of plate tectonic theory-—that the motion of lithospheric plates is essentially independent of flow in the upper mantle beneath the plates-— and implies that the upper mantle and the overlying South American continent have remained coupled since the breakup of the Gondwanaland super-continent and opening of the South Atlantic Ocean some 120 million years ago. This result also implies that large-scale convection in the mantle may be responsible for the motion of the great continental plates, such as South America, where the driving force for plate motion has not been well understood.”
(Dybas, Cheryl; NSFNEWS Digest 54, November 8, 1995. Cr. D. Swaner. NSF= National Science Foundation. The cyber-address for the NSFNEWS Digest is: nsfnews@nsf.gov
The computerless may read more in: VanDecar, John C., et al; “Seismic Evidence for a Fossil Mantle Plume beneath South America and Implications for Plate Driving Forces,” Nature, 378:25, 1995.
From Science Frontiers #103, JAN-FEB 1996. © 1997 William R. Corliss (R.I.P.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.