It has been months since the fire, yet the fire investigators have not determined the cause, yet the home owners have demanded that Apple compensate them on their own conclusion. Their insurance has paid off for the fire, but they say that their HOME FIRE somehow interrupted their operation of their FARM. . . and they need Apple to compensate them for that economic loss.
To: Swordmaker
Prove that Apple is at fault. This is a case of “go where the money is.”
2 posted on
03/06/2018 11:20:59 AM PST by
I want the USA back
(My preferred personal pronoun is "Your Majesty.")
To: Swordmaker
You can’t make this stuff up. Dollars to donuts, if the fire was indirectly related to charging the iPhone, the charger being used was one of those cheap knock-offs sold by Amazon & convenience stores/gas stations.
3 posted on
03/06/2018 11:24:03 AM PST by
House Atreides
(BOYCOTT the NFL, its products and players 100% - PERMANENTLY)
To: Swordmaker
4 posted on
03/06/2018 11:24:31 AM PST by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; 5thGenTexan; AbolishCSEU; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; AFreeBird; ...
British Columbia couple claim, without their fire department determining that it is the case, that a charging iPhone 6, caused a house fire which their insurance company paid off $600,000 Canadian, but they are demanding Apple ALSO compensate them for economic losses because they claim they were unable to operate their farm for several months after the fire. The fire from the iPhone 6 is certainly possible as the normal catastrophic battery failure rate is 1 in about 8 million per year. Older batteries are also much more prone to overheating. . . but it has been months and the investigators have been unable to prove it as the source of the fire.—PING!
Burning Apple iPhone 6 Ping!
If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.
5 posted on
03/06/2018 11:27:37 AM PST by
Swordmaker
(My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you racist, bigot!)
To: Swordmaker
I bet everybody signs off at time of service on a disclaimer that the manufacturer is responsible only for cost of item replacement, not incidental damages.
8 posted on
03/06/2018 11:38:56 AM PST by
Genoa
(Luke 12:2)
To: Swordmaker
Guy shoul have use the goat feeding app!!
9 posted on
03/06/2018 11:40:21 AM PST by
freedumb2003
(obozo took 8 years to try to destroy us. Trump took 1 to rebuild us. MAGA!!)
To: Swordmaker
THAT is a $600,000 house? If they got that much for that shack they need to take the money and RUN.
11 posted on
03/06/2018 11:50:59 AM PST by
Sequoyah101
(It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
To: Swordmaker
When someone believes that a particular model of phone is what caused the fire that destroyed their home and livelihood, of
course they'd be perfectly fine replacing it with the exact same death-machine.
What a crock. I don't care what Apple's replacement policy is -- If I truly believed my defective phone destroyed my house, I'd ensure I got something else to replace it, even if it took a few hundred bucks out of my own pocket.
To: Swordmaker
It has been months since the fireActually, if I recall from the original article I got on Idrop news, it happened in 2016, but I couldn't find it in this one.
17 posted on
03/06/2018 4:10:23 PM PST by
Mark17
(Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
To: Swordmaker
"It turned inside-out. And it exploded."
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson