Posted on 02/23/2018 12:05:00 AM PST by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633864/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
I'm having trouble with the websites I normally access to check for Q drops. For now, Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at this link:
Note that Free Republic does not host links to 8 Chan so if you choose to share such links, please do so using "Private Reply" or FReepmail. Thank you.
You can locate my Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one detailed post. His latest update is here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3633864/posts?page=15#15
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
I don't understand this comment, really. Either the "Q program" is legit or it's pure bunkery. I happen to believe it's legit. I don't worship the "man" or the idea of Q. I appreciate the information and what that information leads me to learn. I also appreciate that people who would not otherwise give a crap are now getting involved. I'm not talking about Freepers. We have always cared, or we wouldn't be here.
I'm talking about anon nerds and younger people who are being "red pilled."
With the amount of verifiable information being released by "Q", I find it ridiculous that some even here, refer to those of us investigating the information as "cultists" and "conspiracy theorists."
It's laughable to be mocked by the sleepers when you know you are awake. That's all I'm saying. If you could see this from my perspective, as one who has always been skeptical of so called "conspiracy theories", and is convinced of the veracity of "Q" you would understand my disdain for the "trolls."
I have no problem with trying to debunk each and every piece of information Q puts out there. That is part of the verification process and is important. This is not what these so called "trolls" do. They seek to debunk the entire program well after the truth of it has passed the smell test.
Their resistance is futile.
Reject the rabbit holes and there have been some doozies.
I think each and every "rabbit hole" bears further investigation. Each one has elements of truth contained within. All those truths can and must be connected to the whole. The world is a complex place and Q asks that we expand our thinking. I have no problem with that.
For sure, part of the reason I post it is so I can find it again... LOL. Easier than bookmarking
Exactly my point. So many people come on here to debunk the whole idea of Q and half the thread becomes an argument about the phenomenon rather than the purpose of the thread. Discussion of the INFORMATION.
I would prefer discussion of the information. We call those disruptors "trolls" because they divert the entire thread to flame wars and arguments and the information gets lost in the noise. See what I'm saying? Sounds like you agree.
Good for you. :)
You're not thinking of a Russian bot!
You're thinking of a shapely Russian BOD!
Damn spellcheck. grrrrrrrr.
LOL. Now that I’ve taken my med, I think I’ll head back to bed soonish.
Get to work, slackass.
Q
a.) The military.
b.) The NSA.
???
You’ve seen how many different “Q” figures since last year again? Relying upon a “program” that originated on 8chan which delights in trolling the “normies?” You don’t think all of you guys are regarded as normies? You are. I give some measure of validity here because I dug into it for a good six months back during the whole Chia LeBeouf thing and what I saw disturbed me. I could not escape concluding that there are various intelligence agencies (not all being “ours”) playing games with one another on there amid all the juvenile fapping pics and nazi trolling. I bailed on it after watching a precise prediction of the London terrorist attack on that bridge, days before the fact including GPS coordinates. The implications of that are profound and profoundly upsetting. That’s why I give some amount of credence to “Q” but it’s also why I say don’t fall for it hook line and sinker because there’s a lot of mind-effery going on since the advent of the Trump administration, out in the world in general and certainly there. Caveat emptor. There’s truth there but it ain’t all truth.
Agree 100 percentile. Is there ever "all truth?"
You’re not dealing with one individual or even a group sharing the same agenda, that’s what I’m attempting to convey.
Post #23 - outstanding smartsheet in Excel. Thanks for posting.
There’s honest disagreement, honest puzzlement, and dishonest trolling which masquerades as the other two to get the camel’s nose into the tent and disrupt the flow of ideas. Like how every gang banger who is involved in gun violence as a teenager, is really a good boy who wanted to go to college and “dindu muffin.”
Yes, those three definitely belong on the Troll Wall of Shame.
Because nobody is starting the thread by warning off people who disagree. We are starting off the thread by warning off people who insult, disparage, and attack Freepers as ignorant, sheeplike, cultists, conspiracy theory whackos, and people making FreeRepublic look bad.
Why can't you see that?
I think somehow you got your butt hurt when it shouldn't be. Plenty of people disagree with certain aspects of Q and there is no problem when they articulate those disagreements. It's when they disrupt, mock, and attack that they become "trolls." This is not a difficult concept.
The Weekly Gardening threads are open.
There is a discussion about what seeds to use. Would you go on that thread, and tell other Freepers: "Hey!!! I disagree with this Thread! IT'S ALL WRONG! YOU'RE ALL WRONG! And your opinions about what seeds to use is WRONG! So THERE!
Other Freepers on the thread note your disagreement, and ask you to move on.
You reply:
"Hey listen! I am not going ANYWHERE! I have a RIGHT to come on this thread and tell you all how WRONG you all are! And I'll keep on coming here whenever I damn well please!"
You wouldn't do that, would you?
I didn't think so.
But the trolls on the Q threads sure do.
Night, after night, after night.
Day, after day, after day.
Week, after week, after week.
If someone is willing to display that kind of behavior, then I wager that in person (face-to-face) they are also that kind of person.
Yours, and the other posters, disagreement with the whole subject of Q is duly noted.
Move along.
Perhaps it is hard to absorb for some people and not for others. This is how I see it. I don’t like cruises. I’ve never been on one but based on what I hear there is to do and the whole environment of it all, I think it sounds like a total waste of money and time. Now, I may be scanning through articles on FR and I see a thread on cruises. Do I go on there and start badgering people about how BAD they are based on never having been on one? How stupid I think people are for going on one blah...blah....blah....? Do I go there and be combative in my ambition to convince people that they just aren’t thinking correctly?
No. I mind my own business and move on. Just my opinion.
Yesterday strek6 made a post telling everyone to leave fr and to go to a competitor site. The post was deleted very quickly. I bet he’s been removed.
Post an open thread to FR on any given topic and there are going to be naysayers. Religion, computers, cars, political figures, best place to live, the weather. You’ve been here long enough to have noticed this. People are seldom all of a like mind, on anything.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.