Posted on 02/20/2018 1:53:07 PM PST by pabianice
Managerialisms ideal is a society in which every individual has an equal chance to develop and realize his merit and be rewarded by society for it. This is a process of individual transformation and empowerment. Networking and mentoring programs build personal skills toward increasing personal value, self-affirmation, and self-realization. Diversity training is a transformative educational experience which both explores the self and creates cultural competencies. Even white men can gain marketable interpersonal skills and realize multicultural character ideals through diversity.
(Excerpt) Read more at quillette.com ...
I stopped reading at “Even white men”...
Yeah, that made me laugh.
Were any buzz words and corporate jargon left out of this article? I think the writer managed to use them all.
>>Even white men can gain marketable interpersonal skills and realize multicultural character ideals through diversity
Nah. We just sit there fantasizing about black guns, big boobs, and destroying the environment with V-8 engines. Its our privilege!
Diversity is the perversion of the civil rights movement. It creates conflict at the expense of culture. Diversity requires an over class of elitists to keep order. It is the obverse of democracy, opting instead for oligarchy in which diversity is maintained by authoritarian fiat.
Diversity destroys federalism by restricting the actions of the majority through subservience to minority interests.
Whereas Federalism protects the minority, diversity elevates minorities by granting their interests veto authority over majorities.
Plainly, diversity is tyranny.
Diversity is just an excuse for equalizing outcomes when there is a general equality of opportunity.
The goal of diversity proponents is not equality of outcomes.
Aiming for diversity is the same as aiming at your foot and pulling the trigger.
Well said summary of diversity.
“Were any buzz words and corporate jargon left out of this article? I think the writer managed to use them all.”
You beat me to it - what a pile of manure!
He is the perfect example of what Taleb Nassim calls an IYI - Intellectual Yet Idiot.
https://medium.com/incerto/the-intellectual-yet-idiot-13211e2d0577
Sic Semper Tyrannius
Elites don't care about "diversity" policies or "affirmative action" programs, for the simple reason that such programs affect the white middle class, never the "elites", nor their children.
To an elite, the true enemy is the middle class. The children of elites are often intellectual mediocrities. They FEAR being supplanted and displaced by some exceptionally bright and energetic middle class kid. They desire a world where the ONLY path to wealth and power, is from "connections".
The article was going so well until the fourth sentence. We all know diversity is really exclusionary.
In other words, it is the exact opposite of what it claims.
"Britain and America are two of the most tolerant societies in history, having demonstrated that tolerance by welcoming refugees and immigrants from all parts of the world and then turning them into British and American citizens by inducting them into the national community. These immigrants learned our language and adopted our history as their own. Such cultural inclusion is, in fact, the only way to achieve a successful multi-ethnic society. . . .
"The concept of multiculturalism threatens to unravel all that good work. Here is a genuinely utopian enterprise, more utopian indeed than the Tower of Babel. . . . The U.S. is moving toward a system in which the government presides over a number of different social groups, some of which have their own language and type of education. This approach undermines social unity and allows construction of a multicultural society, which is the very opposite of America's previous practice. The government aims to supervise these different groups and keep the peace by redistributing income from one to another.
"Thus the utopia of multiculturalism involves a bureaucratic class presiding over a nation divided into a variety of ethnic nationalities. That, of course, looks awfully like the old Soviet Union. Such a system cannot work, and its failure is likely to inflict great damage on the people, their traditions, and their liberties."
-- Lady Margaret Thatcher, former British prime minister, writing on "Resisting the Utopian Impulse" in the spring issue of American Outlook
The Naked Self-Interest Of The Bureaucratic Class
Townhall.com | June 20, 2014 | Jonah Goldberg
Posted on 06/20/2014 5:06:37 AM PDT by Kaslin
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3170077/posts
Of the Bureaucrats, by the Bureaucrats, for the Bureaucrats
National Review | 06/20/2014 | Jonah Goldberg
Posted on 06/25/2014 10:12:27 AM PDT by Rusty0604
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3172200/posts
“To an elite, the true enemy is the middle class. The children of elites are often intellectual mediocrities. They FEAR being supplanted and displaced by some exceptionally bright and energetic middle class kid. They desire a world where the ONLY path to wealth and power, is from “connections”.
Exhibit “A”: Donald Trump outfoxes and supplants Jeb Bush.
Trump may not be middle class now in the financial sense, but his family background was not of the “elite” class. He and his father before him had to work to earn their money and make their mark. Jeb just had to have the last name “Bush” and run for office in a fairly reliably Republican state.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.