Posted on 02/12/2018 9:54:40 PM PST by Daffynition
Former President Barack Obama went gaga for Michelle Obama’s official portrait Monday — thanking the artist for capturing the former first lady’s “hotness.”
“Amy, I want to thank you for so spectacularly capturing the grace and beauty and the intelligence and charm and hotness of the woman that I love,” the permanently smitten Obama said, The Hill reported.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
The picture seems just plain weird until one stops to think that the subject of the art and the artist seem to be bowing to the norms of what Islam thinks about representations of humans.
Note that his hand has on its outer side either an extra pinky or a thumb on the wrong side of this hand’s set of fingers. Weird, but that startling hand serves a purpose. It turns image from a real human into something on closer inspection one sees is not human, thereby meeting the Islamic law and preference of not opening opening oneself up to human representation in art.
Obama’s advisors and he himself have surrounded him with a hale of vines and greenery, as is the essence of Islamic art’s taste for the depiction of crawling vines, plants as the main, if not exclusive theme of art.
Obama body, in stark contrast to other presidential portraits, does not stand, just as so so many immigrant Muslims and kneeling football players show their disdain for America by refusing to stand for the flag and the national anthem. Instead he slouches and his legs apart. There are spoofs already out there superimposing a white bathroom commode with flusher for this chair, this because of the every so familiar sitting posture he has struck here.
He could not decline a presidential portrait for the portrait gallery, so he decided to create a scene that mocks the U.S. and the entire non-Islamic world.
My sole concern is: is the taxpayers paying for it?
ROFLMAO... good God... so pathetic.
Seems appropriate for a guy who led a majority of Americans down the garden path.
The painting by Kehinde Wiley is called “Judith and Holofernes,” which refers to a story from the apocryphal Book of Judith which inspired a whole bunch of art during the Renaissance and Baroque periods. While the original story did involve a woman whacking off a guy’s head, Wiley’s choice to use a black woman holding a dead white woman's severed head is clearly a deliberate one. Wiley’s become pretty famous for his reimagining of traditional European portraits using black people as stand-ins.
The story revolves around Judith, a daring and beautiful widow, who is upset with her Jewish countrymen for not trusting God to deliver them from their foreign conquerors. She goes with her loyal maid to the camp of the enemy general, Holofernes, with whom she slowly ingratiates herself, promising him information on the Israelites. Gaining his trust, she is allowed access to his tent one night as he lies in a drunken stupor. She decapitates him, then takes his head back to her fearful countrymen. The Assyrians, having lost their leader, disperse, and Israel is saved. Though she is courted by many, Judith remains unmarried for the rest of her life.
1613 - Judith with the Head of Holofernes by Cristafano Allori 
I’m referring to the new “portraits” of the Obamas that this artist did, not the one with the beheaded woman by the same artist.
The left hand looks deformed.
I think these portraits qualify for the Trump curse.
Are those marijuana plants?
he has no thumbs on his left hand!
The Bing people have a sense of humor.
Looks like she’s wearing window curtains, not only in the portrait but IRL.
Tan line where his wedding ring should be.
He wipes his ass with that left hand.
And the Mooch painter is obviously NOT GOOD....but maybe they love it because it looks nothing like the Mooch!
I like it better without the unsightly weed in the middle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.