Posted on 02/12/2018 3:56:31 AM PST by ransomnote
Edited on 02/13/2018 7:01:59 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to share information and opinions about Q Anon content. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3630912/posts?q=1&;page=1>
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
All Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following link:
You can locate my prior Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference:
A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
Please private message me to report trolls. The Admins have limited time to deal with requests regarding trolls and I'm hoping to reduce abuse reports from this thread from multiple persons into one set of requests.
If you are new to Q Anon trolls, you may find the following thread useful.
Q Anon: Increasing levels of disinformation and trolling
hahahahaha. Hey, nudes of Ginsberg may cause more devastation than ACTUAL nukes...
I will speak to my editor, goodman. :)
Yay Jocko. One of the best Twilight Zones EVER.
We need another Q drop to solve. I feel frisky.
It’s a cookbook! Good episode.
Of the options, I also think the following are possible:
1st Choice: At a time where the public is about to learn the MSM has been betraying them by taking intel leaks from the CIA daily at 4 am (Project Mockingbird still lives!), Rush needs to stay away from the appearance of accepting or utilizing intel leaks from the current adminstration(Q).
2nd choice: Conservatives are in jeopardy in the mainstream as it is; even speculating about the existence of Q would at the very least eliminate airtime.
3rd choice: He’s never heard of Q or doesn’t believe Q is legit.
I liked that Gizmo -> Gitmo typo too.
Quite plausible.
I've said before that mainstream reference to Q not only jeopardizes the operation, but risks that mainstream media person being "Alex Jonesed." We all have seen even here on FR how mockery, and ridicule is used to deny facts and silence voices. It is a tried and true method of the left and it works.
Even Hannity dares not mention Q, I don't think. Our guys walk a very fine line on this.
Sounds like a winner, Bagster.
The Olympic judges deducted a point for a tiny little typo which triggered horrible unwanted mental images (hint: nuke is typically spelled with a ‘k’):
“I think Q is referencing Ginsburg’s passing of nude info to North Korea here.”
I can’t stop myself from kidding you about using the word “nude” in the same sentence as RBG!
But FAR MORE IMPORTANTLY, I think you guys have solved it! THANQ!!!!!
I’m with you on this one bagster. It’s probably for the best right now.
I'm satisfied with this Ginsburg story. Sort of ties all the Ginsburg related Q posts together nicely.
Never stop yourself from kidding me. That's just my game.
Of course you see we’re not commenting about the nude thing because we know that’s such a common search term for you it’s first in your autocorrect.
Ahem.
:)
Hahaha...I’m well beyond “nude” searches by now in my neverending search for truth. :)
He has certainly been familiar with a LOT!
Option #4 - This Q stuff is fringey, conspiratorial, verging on nut-case stuff. We don't need the guys publicly fighting the good fight wandering from the good work they are doing standing on the solid ground of what is clearly visible to them and their audience. As you said, we don't need them wandering into Alex Jones-land. They can stand at the entry way to the twilight zone this stuff is in, but they can't open the gate and cross in.
I like the way you put that, Andy. I believe you are totally right on.
Long ago, I knew a LEO whose life was getting bad
There he was all the time working. His wife was going off the deep end
So I talked to him. He did his work.
His wife later murdered him
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.