Posted on 02/09/2018 6:23:09 PM PST by ransomnote
#696
Feb 9 2018 18:06:34
Q
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
[Next week]
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
We warned you.
You are stupid.
Can you sleep?
We can help.
Q
(Excerpt) Read more at qcodefag.github.io ...
Obama White House?
Of course O is crooked. I was only trying - poorly - to make the point that it’s difficult to prove that because he gave them the money, and it was used for bad purposes, that he gave it to expedite those bad purposes. But if they can prove quid pro quo, then we DO have him!
State Department.
place mark
Q addiction placeholder
Yes, that makes more sense, and the holdovers’ alliance is with the Obama regime; covering two bases with one acronym.
Kalorama (zero/valjar) or Mar-A-Lago?
That would seem to be the most logical answer.
I keep a computer history playlist on YouTube of all the computer videos I’ve made because of the historical significance of many. One video was made overnight when we could just show video running on a computer screen, even with bugs in the windows showing the videos, and the director wanted to demonstrate in a keynote address. I got pulled into a 6 hour lawyer’s deposition on another because of a Microsoft law suit over gesture recognition.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYTtL1FB2XCphoR3BCIszdSlRFSQAOMPs
If they allow you to search the list on BBN, it should bring up a lot of voice recognition videos, mostly for battlefield logistics.
In actual fact, at the time of making the videos I had to do a lot of takes to show good recognition. I assume that 20 years on it should be doing a much better job.
I NEVER caught that. Good one.
Maybe Podesta?
That’s interesting the former world wide snooping organization’s founder doesn’t want to be snooped on?
Which Edward? Eric Holder and Schmidt also work.
Good point. Thanks.
Welcome to FR!
:-)
This is like Jesus with the disciples - remember he would speak in parables and the disciples wouldn’t always get it and it would frustrate our Lord because he thought he was making things perfectly clear + easy ... there was a series of posts at one time when Q actually said something like it was going to be harder than they imagined to walk this line of conveying + telling things without explicitly stating ;)
Hey now, went down a rabbit hole and came back with moar questions.
TK_964389&66
If this an airline flight identifier, Then TK_9643 is a Turkish airline flight cause TK = Turkish airlines. Turkish Airlines is a STAR Alliance member. The plane could be an Air New Zealand plane (??)
http://www.staralliance.com/en/member-airline-details?airlineCode=NZ
or an Azul airlines A330
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azul_Brazilian_Airlines
Third plane picture from top, just above the blue bus
Now, 89 & 66 would be code share indicators for the airline flying on the Turkish airline flight 9463! I could not drill down on the suspected code share numbers
What is TK_9463??
That’s a flight going back and forth between Brazil and Goiania.
https://flightaware.com/live/flight/THY9463#flightPageActivityLog
So, who’s flying between Brazil and Goiana?
Anyone else gone down this path? Am I off target?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.