Posted on 02/07/2018 3:58:06 AM PST by ransomnote
Q drops #661- #664 all mention the Rothschilds, Austria, estate sale, Black Forest, and two of the drops ask "What went on there?." Q repeated information for emphasis, particularly if no one has correctly identified the important information in it. Here's an excerpt of one of the drops.
#661
Would POTUS make a serious accusation if the TRUTH wasnt about to come to LIGHT? Black Forest.
Austria.
Rothschild.
FIRE sale days after post?
What went on there?
Dopey.
You have more than you know.
Q
Note that the Black Forest is in southwestern German and an old Rothschild estate is located 7 hours away from there, or was given the family just sold the Austrian estate at a "fire sale" price.
The Rothschilds just sold their Austrian estate which the family had owned for almost 150 years. The property included a "stately lodge" and two power plants.
A 1/31/2018 Bloomberg article titled "Rothschilds Sell Austrian Hunting Estate in a Historic Deal" explains that the property (13,000 acres) sold for $112 million dollars ("fire sale" price), the sellers were Rothschild heirs Nancy Clarice Tilghman and Geoffrey R. Hoguet. The sellers said that they sold the property because the buyers promised to preserve and develop the forestry in the region.
FReepers, have you found solid evidence behind what is meant by this information? Do you know, "What went on there?" I've seen speculation that one or both locations served as a religious hub given that the Rothschilds serve as the church for the New World Order. Note that the "church" that holds the New World Order members together is that of Satanism. For this reason, it's possible, "What went on there," refers to horrific acts not unlike those believed to take place at the Standard Hotel. Others have suggested the sale of the property indicates a need for money, which sounds possible, but that wouldn't answer "What went on there?"
Have you seen good analysis of the timing and importance of the sudden sale of the estate which had been in the Rothschild family for almost 150 years? Please share links or summaries. I believe it is important information to those who follow Q drops given that Q has repeated this information 4 times.
I don’t agree that “it’s well known that the Rothschilds are Jews.” The ones in the New World Order are at the head of a non-Jewish cult and The Rothschilds, and most other Ashkenazi Jews, are descended from the Khazars who are actually Turks.
That’s insulting and has no proof whatsoever and DNA studies absolutely prove the Middle-Eastern ancestry of Ashkenazi Jews.
http://www.jpost.com/Enviro-Tech/Jews-A-religious-group-people-or-race
That Khazars/Turk story is STRAIGHT out of Stormfront!!!
The Rothschilds part of the family are head of the New World Order cult. They are not practicing Jews. I’ve heard that there is a Christian wing of the Rothschild family in Austria but I don’t know if it that’s true -it’s certainly possible. I don’t read Stormfront and have often encountered the assertion re Ashkenazie Jews over many different platforms. I think we can at least agree that Satan worshippers are not Jews? And that only those specified as heading the New World Order religion would be viewed as Satanists?
Oh, Dear me. You mean I have a reputation? That kind of reputation? Oh well. Thanks. Am humbled. I try—most of the time.
Thanks. Left the shortcut on my desktop this time.
I did a little research. At one point the theory of Khazar/Turks was used to refute the antisemetic accusation that “Jews killed CHrist.” But there’s been wrestling over the idea with actual antisemites also using the Khazar heritage claim. Wiki has this to say about DNA:
“”Thus, analysis of Ashkenazi Jews together with a large sample from the region of the Khazar Khaganate corroborates the earlier results that Ashkenazi Jews derive their ancestry primarily from populations of the Middle East and Europe, that they possess considerable shared ancestry with other Jewish populations, and that there is no indication of a significant genetic contribution either from within or from north of the Caucasus region”, the authors concluded.[163]”
So you are correct in that DNA analysis refutes the Khazar/Turk story, but wrong in implying it’s origins are strictly antisemitic. When I first started reading about that 20 years ago, it was a benign recitation of a ancient ruler who converted to Judaism and his people therefore adopting the religion of their king.
I continue to point to the fact that those who choose to be Satanists (New WOrld Order) would not be classified as Jews.
I think the Jerusalem Post is a better resource about Jews than, say, Jeff Rense’s or David Duke’s web sites, no? Most of the kook sites pushing the “Jews are Khazaks”, and there are a lot of them, come from them and actually just a handful of people pushing this. The whole idea was born in the Internet age.
Again, look up the DNA—not historical—sites. Most of the DNA studies identify Askhanzi as Middle East/Western European! NOT central Asia.
Now, having said that I will say there are a ton of Atheists in high places. I’m sure their are tons of non-believing Rothschilds, but also Fords, Windsors, Astors, Hiltons, Carnegies, DuPonts, Bush’s, Kennedy’s, etc., etc.
Well I’ve never read white supremacist sites so I’ll defer to your judgement on what they contain. As I said, the old info I recall reading was a dry recitation of a ruler converting to Judaism, not some white hooded denigration of people.
I just cited DNA that dispels Turk rumor so I won’t look it up again, thanks.
I always say, not everyone in any church or religion is a true believer. I think the New World Order has plenty of fake Satanists who role their eyes and go along with the mumbo jumbo to be on the “in” crowd with access to wealth and power. However, I believe the Hillary Clinton/ Lyn Rothschilds etc. are believers in their cult.
OK, and I do appreciate you looking into it. More often people here stick to their guns without questioning their assumptions and that is very noble and intelligent of you!!
During the Third Reich the Nazi’s made a lot of hay propaganda-wise about the Rothschilds. It yet remains a dog whistle for others, especially the Strom Fronters.
Can the Rothschilds be despicable and evil? Aboslutely! Still, I doubt it is a trait of the family, but rather individuals.
As a Christian, I believe Christ was a Jew, and that the Jews are the “apple of God’s eye.” At the Seder service I attended, I heard that those who support the Jews are Blessed by God. I believe antisemitism is demonic in nature. Therefore, I am grateful to people like you who assist me in avoiding possible traps and snares of thinking that may falsely portray my opinions of Jews as hate. Thank you for taking the time to provide that important information.
1. The R's are only genetic Jews. They ceased being children of Abraham, Isaac & Jacob in the Biblical-heart sense when they became satanists.
2. Many people are flip, slick, loose and easy about the designation the R's as Jews. It's only true in a historical genetic sense.
3. Qx read a book 40+ years ago something like: The Jews, The Bible and the Supernatural. One of the main assertions was that there's something inherent to the children of Jacob such that when they become evil, they become VERY evil, indeed.
4. We think that the R's are a prime exhibit of the truth of that.
5. imho, it is entirely proper, fitting, reasonable and even necessary to be absolutely hostile toward the R's (those involved in satanism) WITHOUT being the least bit antisemetic.
It's a bit like being entirely hostile to Obummer without being the least bit racist against blacks.
That topic is very low on my radar. I don't think we should devolve into engaging in thousand year old religious wars.
One man's opinion.
p.s. Hey Admin. mods. With all due respect. When will my account be returned to full posting status. Did you forget about me?
You're awesome.
And also thanks to you! I hope I was not accusing you of anti-Semitism. I was worried not about Q’s post, just that some would propagate it based on the baggage the Rothschild name can bring, in reply to another poster. The truth must never-the-less be followed.
I believe what you so eloquently stated.
Bottom line, absolutely!
Glad you're back in the full. You are quite humorous and your posts are always funny, optimistic and smart!
I shall join you in the Q wars after my nappy nap. Being in the joint takes a toll on a man.
Since you were so kind, I will take this time to tell you that you are amongst the most interesting posters of them all. I learn a LOT from you.
:)
Oh dear. Maybe, sometimes, when I channel my housemate. LOL. He’s taught me a lot in a number of sphere’s. I had a high IQ before and was moderately above average informed. But he sure kicked it up several notches. And then when we started finishing one another’s sentences—and saying “Yeah, I know.” when the other person has only uttered 3-5 words ... it can get amusing, at times.
But now that I'm forced, I will offer my evaluation of you. Yes, you are completely a genius. You also are amongst the most interesting posters on FR and I have learned a lot from you as well and hope to continue to do so.
Your gung fu is very strong and even the most powerful among us should be wary of challenging you.
I personally admire the many strong intellects on this forum, and you are among the toppety top.
There. End awkwardness.
B
I got just about errbody on FR pegged at this point. And my gung fu is exceptional.
I should make a chart of the smartest to the dumbest Freepers. Also the funniest to the stick in the muddiest. There are lots of categories I could do. Maybe after Q saves America and I have more time on my hands. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.