Q drops #666, #667, #668: (2/5/18), incl. images of Dem smart phones during SOTU

https://qcodefag.github.io ^ | 2/5/2018 | Q Anon

[ransomnote]

#666

Feb 5 2018 16:55:42

Q

VJ phone call w/ AS.

42m 13s.

[2 listeners - no IDEN].

[1

]_reroutes_[9 random]

[1 ]_reroutes_[2 random]

Article 3.

Section 3.

Q

#667

Feb 5 2018 17:06:53

Q

Can you read the message?

SOTU.

Black Caucus phone.

Not sure if civilian tech can capture @ that distance.

These people are LITERALLY MORONS.

Q

#668

Feb 5 2018 17:09:14

------Q researcher-------

Anonymous

sotu.phones.candy_.crush_.jpg

Definitely not the Candy Crush phone.

------Q responds---------

Feb 5 2018 17:10:09

Q

Center.

Q

#669

Feb 5 2018 17:11:04

-------Q Researcher------

Anonymous

phone.jpg

>>279886

Better

-------Q responds--------

Feb 5 2018 17:15:26

Q

Find the roll.

1 of 4.

Find the 4th.

Find the film.

Not the capture.

Enhance.

Spread.

Will go viral.

Source _ archive offline.

Raw only.

Q

[edzo4]

original is a Getty image from a 4k camera you can absolutely read the text

[Fhios]

No hereditary crimes.

[bitt]

[Duchess47]

Looks like maybe at least one is.

[MNDude]

Wow! He always knows what he’s talking about!

[txhurl]

To be fair, I’ve thought, even said, far worse things about zero, but I’m just a prole.

[bitt]

Comic relief...

[Steven W.]

The post says, “Find 1 of 4.”
My interpretation, there are three seen in the widely circulated photo I’ve seen but apparently if you review the raw footage there will be four and the fourth person is the one to focus on (literally and figuratively) - the fact there appears to be something redacted in one place is consistent with “Raw only. No edits.” ala get the original live footage before it was “fixed” later.

[OKSooner]

Thanks.

[Manuel OKelley]

I have friends who have cameras that will zoom in better than that with more clarity

I have had exposure to facial recognition software so powerful there is no way you believe until you see what it can do at a distance...the idea of privacy or anonymity in most anything is a relic of previous decades

[Gahanna Bob]

2 listeners on the call. That should cover the 2 witnesses requirement.

[Slyfox]

The congresswoman playing her phone game was identified as Rep. Brenda Lawrence (D-Michigan) by at least one media outlet — the Daily Mail. , which ID’d the other two women as Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-New Jersey) and Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-Ohio).

Please note the huge fake white beads around her neck, she is the one texting in the middle:

[Axenolith]

The phone shots aren’t related to the 42 min call.

[rwilson99]

My guess is that Beatty was texting something else entirely... and might be the target.

Number 4 may very well be the copy of the speech with the redaction due to a different hand position from the original shot.

[Axenolith]

You can’t punish the descendants of traitors.

[reasonisfaith]

Wrong.

If it happened, pictures were taken.

[combat_boots]

Oh yes you can

[Steven W.]

From earlier, "BLUNT" may be ROTHSCHILD'S FRIEND BLUNT; INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABUSE RING

[Steven W.]

Some folks looking at it now say Darrell Issa and several other congressmen were looking right at the phone when the texts were made.

[bitt]

8 chan says this: OKAY MORONS, LISTEN UP NONE OF YOU HAVE WORKED WITH HD VIDEO BEFORE. I HAVE. UNLESS YOU HAVE 300 SPARE GBs ON YOUR HD, YOU'RE NOT GETTING A RAW VIDEO FROM ANYWHERE ONLINE. THIS IS WHY I'M TRYING TO TELL YOU - Q WAS TALKING ABOUT A STILL IMAGE. IT'S THIS IMAGE www.gettyimages.com/license/912414994 IT'S BY THE SAME PHOTOGRAPHER WHO TOOK THE "CANDY CRUSH" PHOTO. IT'S THE FOURTH ONE HE TOOK FROM THE BALCONY. IT'S IN THE RAW FILE FORMAT. LOOK ON THE BOTTOM LEFT CORNER. RAW WOULD LET US SEE THE PHONE. STOP CHASING INTERNET VIDEOS RIGHT NOW, BECAUSE THEY'RE LITERALLY NOT RAW SOURCE MATERIAL. THEY WILL ALL BE COMPRESSED. OBTAINING THIS PHOTO IS YOUR GOAL RIGHT NOW: