Posted on 02/03/2018 5:59:02 AM PST by ransomnote
We were minding our own posts and topic quite civilly until umpteen assaults had accrued. Sheesh.
If they could change 8 million votes, why not change just a few more ... in WI, PA & MI ... and steal the election?
Who said they were perfect in their calculations?
Normally, I wouldn’t answer a question with a question, but sticking to the overall theme of the thread....
Could it be that someone made yet another assumption that went wrong?
What are NSA core records?
How can I prove it to my liberal siblings, that Trump won the popular vote?
I was doing a little research, found a clip of Oprah/Trump from 1988 - has a little more in it than was shown in the News. Also, Trump had read the book Permanent War Economy; American Capitalism in Decline at this point in time.
I remember seeing a clip of part of this interview then, and thinking I sure agreed with what he said.
It’s alleged that Roy Cohn was tutoring Trump regarding the Deep State in the 1970s. Just some interesting information.
Link to Interview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEPs17_AkTI
My solution - I don’t watch it, read it or listen to it, other than in rare instances, and then always with the attitude that it cannot be trusted.
In regards to GWII, W went after Saddam because Saddam tried to kill daddy (GHWB) on a visit to Kuwait (IIRC) after GW1. Yes, it was the wrong application of military power after 9/11/2001. Afghanistan was a valid target. Though not all were born there, 15 or the 19 9/11 hijackers possessed Saudi citizenship at the time of the 9/11 attack. The so-called 20th hijacker I don’t remember. Seems like he did, too.
It was not only the wrong application of military power, it took a year or more of bowing and scraping to the United Nations for Dubya to act.
And he acts on the wrong country..maybe Afghanistan was relevant but the Saudis should have been cut off at the knees...MADE to produce bin laden.
Unless, of course, the Saudis were doing the bidding of our beloved President George Dubya Bush. . . Not so far fetched for me to imagine anymore.
I voted for Dubya..twice as governor and twice as president, and I’m certain I was a fool for doing so.
Thanks Magglepuss, I didn’t realize that President Trump had been interviewed about that.
So who’s word do I trust, President Bush or President Trump? hmmmm....
I choose President Trump.
I always thought it was a very blatant message to those there and the world. The military has President Trump’s back.
I pee'd on a tree last night. What's the difference?
There is s huge amount of information on a quite confusing story, the story of how Pres Trump won a national election. With the information provided by the MSM, no one can make sense of it so alternative story lines flourish. What is true? Honor, for one, which comes from a good upbringing. That requires God. Take that away and evil spreads. So the simplest explanation is that some evil and Godless people, the same really, plotted to take over a country, the richest and most powerful in the world. It almost succeeded. Now we are in the midst of an epic battle between good and evil and most of us are only watching. If we, as a people, have to get off the couch there will be blood shed, quite a lot really. If Pres Trump succeeds, there will be hangings. Q*s is the most plausible story line, however hard it is to believe, and squares with POTUS and AG being honorable men. Honorable men, doing what honorable men do.
Waiting for the call to the DC mall.
BTW I like Sausage egg McMuffins for breakfast before bloody revolts.
Apparently his middle leg hasn't done any work in a very, very, very, long time...
I cannot disagree.
Brendon Dilley (posts on https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/114336.html#257886).
He is a candidate for Congress in Arizona.
Teaser: this is only *one* memo. There are *nine* in total, only *five* will be released.
He claims that in a later memo, it will be shown that in Obama's Presidential Daily Briefing (note: the Judicial Watch Hillary emails, posted elsewhere on FR, showed that some of these were discussed on her non-govt. server), the discussion included the daily wiretaps of the Trump campaign: and these were shared with Hillary.
I can’t figure Q out. But ‘avoiding prosecution’ as a reason for his ‘style’ is an interesting thought.
However, I can’t believe that the very obvious way that he abbreviates or codes certain terms is any disguise against sophisticated sniffers/bots.
Here in Minnesota he drew 9,000 or more (I was there; most of us were there 2 or 3 hours early) on a Sunday (Vikings game!), in the very liberal Twin Cities, on Nov.6 before the election.
Interesting. Thanks for posting.
According to Brenden Dilley, this will be coming out "soon."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.