Skip to comments.
New Company Claims Its Smart Gun Will be Accepted by Americans
personaldefenseworld.com ^
| Jan. 23, 2018
| PERSONAL DEFENSE WORLD
Posted on 01/29/2018 11:37:11 AM PST by PROCON
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: PROCON
LODESTAR FIREARMS IS DEVELOPING A NEW SMART GUN CHAMBERED IN 9MM THAT IT HOPES WILL GAIN WIDESPREAD ACCEPTANCE AMONG AMERICANS.Well they can hope in one hand...and we all know the rest.
41
posted on
01/29/2018 12:15:32 PM PST
by
Disambiguator
(Keepin' it analog.)
To: PROCON
No way ANY cop would want to carry one.
Of course not. But what if the city government of Seattle, SF, Baltimore or Ithaca likes the idea and requires them for the local cops?
42
posted on
01/29/2018 12:20:11 PM PST
by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics.)
To: PROCON
43
posted on
01/29/2018 12:22:46 PM PST
by
Howie66
("Tone down the tagline please." - Admin Moderator)
To: WayneS
44
posted on
01/29/2018 12:23:52 PM PST
by
Howie66
("Tone down the tagline please." - Admin Moderator)
To: grobdriver
"...Why does *anyone* keep fooling with this concept?..."
It is puzzling why they keep trying over, and over, and over again.
My darn iPhone sometimes gets moody and wont recognize my fingerprint under perfect conditions.
Like I would ever be certain this smart gun would work in heat, cold, under stress, and/or covered in mud, sweat, blood, or water? No thanks.
45
posted on
01/29/2018 12:24:55 PM PST
by
Blue Jays
( Rock hard ~ Ride free)
To: PROCON
46
posted on
01/29/2018 12:25:23 PM PST
by
OKSooner
(Joan Rivers, RIP)
To: Darksheare
The absolute primary function of a gun, the reason it’s owned, is for it to go BANG in a life-and-death situation.
The #1 failure mode users most want to avoid is “pull trigger, no bang”.
That’s the whole purpose of this tech: cause exactly that to happen.
If this tech fails, as in a legit user tries to fire in defense of innocent life, it won’t.
The CORRECT failure mode is to fire on demand, even if the user isn’t authenticated.
47
posted on
01/29/2018 12:25:34 PM PST
by
ctdonath2
(It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
To: WayneS
“Does the manufacturer think putting an American flag on it will lead to widespread acceptance?”
They can’t be that stupid, can they?
48
posted on
01/29/2018 12:26:17 PM PST
by
Howie66
("Tone down the tagline please." - Admin Moderator)
To: PROCON
Lol...so they are suggesting an implant so you will be the only able to fire the gun. Why not just implant the gun?
49
posted on
01/29/2018 12:29:38 PM PST
by
Joe 6-pack
(Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
To: PROCON
If something can possibly go wrong with it - besides the usual mechanical maladies that could afflict a handgun - that would prevent me from firing my own weapon, then I will NOT buy it, not even for $1.00. I will simply not reduce my chances of survival...let alone pay for that dubious privilege.
NFW will I buy this gun, or anything that operates on similar principles.
50
posted on
01/29/2018 12:31:02 PM PST
by
Ancesthntr
("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
To: PROCON
If for some reason you need to shoot with your "other" hand, I guess you'll have to always leave home with a watch on both wrists.
It can also be a bit clumsy in the middle of the night if you somehow can't get your watch on your wrist quickly enough when the killer is coming through your bedroom door.
I can think of at least 100 more scenarios where using one of these in an emergency is a really really really bad idea.
51
posted on
01/29/2018 12:31:19 PM PST
by
Gritty
(Feminism ends as loneliness, bitterness and heartache that Merlot and cats can't fill-Lee Jackson)
To: PROCON
I WILL NOT COMPLY with any scheme to electronically control the firing of my personal sidearm.
52
posted on
01/29/2018 12:32:22 PM PST
by
backwoods-engineer
(The GOP-Democrat-Media Uniparty must be destroyed.)
To: Howie66; WayneS
Does the manufacturer think putting an American flag on it will lead to widespread acceptance?
"They cant be that stupid, can they?"
They were stupid enough to put the flag on backwards.
53
posted on
01/29/2018 12:47:58 PM PST
by
Garth Tater
(What's mine is mine.)
To: PROCON
Nope.
Not only will I not buy it, I’ve told the gun stores I shop at that if they every carry a “Smart Gun”, I will never shop there again. This is a deal breaker for manufacturers and retailers. Given the punitive laws that will come into effect if a “Smart Gun” hits the market, I want everyone from my local dealer to BudsGunShop to Remington/Ruger/Glock to know that I object.
All of my guns are already smart guns. I follow the firearms safety rules 100% of the time. That’s all the “smart” that is needed.
54
posted on
01/29/2018 12:54:03 PM PST
by
Pollster1
("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
To: PROCON
If I assume that this actually comes to fruition, there would be SUBSTANTIAL risk of liability should the gun fail to fire when needed.
55
posted on
01/29/2018 12:56:54 PM PST
by
taxcontrol
(SStupid should hurt)
To: ctdonath2
Their failure mode is, and I predict, an expensive paperweight.
56
posted on
01/29/2018 1:01:32 PM PST
by
Darksheare
(Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
To: ctdonath2
I worked at a bank some time ago. Part of my job was installing and repairing the millions of locks there. The locks were set to “fail/open” ... if the power went out all the doors and vaults would automatically open so as not to trap people. I suspect these smart guns will also be set to misfire under many circumstances; i.e. within 500 yards of a school.
57
posted on
01/29/2018 1:02:47 PM PST
by
pabianice
(LINE)
To: PROCON
I would state that in no way would I replace any of my guns with this piece of crap but then all my guns were lost in a freak boating accident... so... ya know...
58
posted on
01/29/2018 1:03:49 PM PST
by
Mad Dawgg
(If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
To: PROCON
The iP1 is chambered in .22 LR and was priced at nearly $1,800 when you combined the base gun and the RFID watch. A very pricey brick.
No Thank you.
59
posted on
01/29/2018 1:08:45 PM PST
by
RedMonqey
(“Rockets... Lottsa Rockets..”)
To: PROCON
To each his own. Maybe if I had young children in the house I’d be somewhat interested but reliability would need to be near-flawless.
60
posted on
01/29/2018 1:10:45 PM PST
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson