Posted on 01/27/2018 6:07:04 AM PST by ransomnote
It was Q, not I, who said it would all be public. *He* said it would happen that way. If you reread Q’s posts, you will see for yourself that it was all supposed to be very public. Q said so specifically.
A partial recap:
upon the arrest announcement of Mr. Podesta (actionable 11.4). Confirmation (to the public) of what is occurring will then be revealed and will not be openly accepted. Public riots are being organized in serious numbers in an effort to prevent the arrest and capture of more senior public officials. On POTUS’ order, a state of temporary military control will be actioned and special ops carried out. False leaks have been made to retain several within the confines of the United States to prevent extradition and special operator necessity. Rest assured, the safety and well-being of every man, woman, and child of this country is being exhausted in full. However, the atmosphere within the country will unfortunately be divided as so many have fallen for the corrupt and evil narrative that has long been broadcast. We will be initiating the Emergency Broadcast System (EMS) during this time in an effort to provide a
direct message (avoiding the fake news) to all citizens. Organizations and/or people that wish to do us harm during this time will be met with swift fury – certain laws have been pre-lifted to provide our great military the necessary authority to handle and conduct these operations (at home and abroad).
“It was Q, not I, who said it would all be public.
If that was Q, yes.
That said, the world isn’t static.
What else do you have amigo?
Why do you dispute that those quotes came from Q? That page has been cited *at least* a hundred times on this site alone as being an official [please look the word up in a dictionary; it has an array of meanings] aggregate of Q’s posts. Are you the only person who disputes the authenticity of these posts, or can you link me to others?
If circumstances changed, Q could have posted ~5 Nov: “the world isn’t static.”
He didn’t.
You are burning up incredible amounts of time. Please either provide some reliable evidence that these quotes weren’t made by Q/The page recommended by Q’s most devoted supporters is bogus, or else let at least that particular canard go. It’s a massive, completely unnecessary waste of time.
“Why do you dispute that those quotes came from Q? That page has been cited *at least* a hundred times on this site alone as being an officiaL”
Just pointing out it is not the official, secure Q site. They very well may be Qs statements.
“If circumstances changed, Q could have posted...”
Sure. He did not. There may be a reason. You are convinced there is not. I’m not convinced either way. You’re an atheist on Q. I’m agnostic on Q. That shouldn’t trouble you any more than it troubles me - which is zero.
Time will tell.
“You are burning up incredible amounts of time.”
It is you alone that made a truth claim. I am merely responding to your posts.
Just don’t respond. You’ll be OK :-)
Would it be possible to include the date of Q OP drop in Headline? That would be helpful, for me if I run across research, I would go back to original thread.
thanks
‘Just pointing out it is not the official, secure Q site.’
No. You are needlessly burning up massive amounts of time by making nonsense arguments. If Q didn’t make those posts, it should take you ~60 seconds to prove it. But you’d rather engage in childish nonsense than make an actual point. That’s entirely on you.
“If circumstances changed, Q could have posted [the world isn’t static].”
‘Sure. He did not.’
It’s a question of normalcy and mental health. A normal, mentally healthy person would *notice* that his huge, major, landscape-altering predictions had not come anywhere close to happening. He’d be honest and sufficienty connected to reality to at least acknowledge the situation. It might be no more than, ‘The world is not a static place,’ — but he’d at least post that.
Q’s complete silence re the cataclysmic failure of all his predictions is psychotic. There is no more accurate word for it.
A good many of Q’s devotees act as if they’re psychotic as well. Whether or not they actually are, idk. I’m only commenting on the appearance of their actions.
Give it up.
You want to make a blanket statement that is in fact, falsifiable. If you’re good with that, great.
I’m not. I am unconvinced either way.
I do not have to prove you are false. I did not make a truth claim. You did. You did not prove it.
OK. Your call.
Untrue. I merely posted predictions that Q made which didn’t happen. I.e.: Hillary and Podesta were not publicly arrested. That’s a simple fact.
Your posts are quickly becoming incoherent. What was the point of the last one?
Please be specific; thank you in advance.
My point is that you posted that Q’s post is false.
I gave examples that prove your truth claim can be wrong and is unknowable.
I said I am unconvinced by you or Q.
I asked if you have anything else, or if this is all you have?
If it is all you have, I’m done talking.
If you have more, post it.
That is all.
Iow, you’re now resorting to nonsense.
Brcause no, Podesta and Hillary were not publicly arrested, to the accompaniment of national mayhem.
But if you wish to imagine they were, have at it. No one’s going to stop you, or even try.
Huh. Where’s the tripcode?
Do you have any idea what you're talking about, or are you merely trolling?
There is lying, there is lying-by-omission, there is tactfully avoiding something because it's embarrassing, there's knowing why something is unimportant but not explaining why, there's taking it for granted someone you're talking too knows why, and there's full disclosure.
May I suggest your reply on this answer is toward the earlier end of the set of characterizations just supplied.
Why so much hostility? I post facts. In return for which I get psychoanalyzed and accused of horrible motives.
The Q quotes came straight from the page I have seen referenced ~100x by Q-believers. You can do a simple search and read the quotes for yourself. [And btw, I just saw the exact same page cited *again* on a new Q thread. No one ever posts a caution about it, warning that some of the quotes aren’t authentic. That *only* happens when I post Q quotes from that page.]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.