“Why do you dispute that those quotes came from Q? That page has been cited *at least* a hundred times on this site alone as being an officiaL”
Just pointing out it is not the official, secure Q site. They very well may be Qs statements.
“If circumstances changed, Q could have posted...”
Sure. He did not. There may be a reason. You are convinced there is not. I’m not convinced either way. You’re an atheist on Q. I’m agnostic on Q. That shouldn’t trouble you any more than it troubles me - which is zero.
Time will tell.
“You are burning up incredible amounts of time.”
It is you alone that made a truth claim. I am merely responding to your posts.
Just don’t respond. You’ll be OK :-)
‘Just pointing out it is not the official, secure Q site.’
No. You are needlessly burning up massive amounts of time by making nonsense arguments. If Q didn’t make those posts, it should take you ~60 seconds to prove it. But you’d rather engage in childish nonsense than make an actual point. That’s entirely on you.
“If circumstances changed, Q could have posted [the world isn’t static].”
‘Sure. He did not.’
It’s a question of normalcy and mental health. A normal, mentally healthy person would *notice* that his huge, major, landscape-altering predictions had not come anywhere close to happening. He’d be honest and sufficienty connected to reality to at least acknowledge the situation. It might be no more than, ‘The world is not a static place,’ — but he’d at least post that.
Q’s complete silence re the cataclysmic failure of all his predictions is psychotic. There is no more accurate word for it.
A good many of Q’s devotees act as if they’re psychotic as well. Whether or not they actually are, idk. I’m only commenting on the appearance of their actions.