Posted on 01/24/2018 12:20:02 PM PST by ransomnote
Q !UW.yye1fxo 01/24/18 (Wed) 13:39:13 No.57
Q !UW.yye1fxo 01/24/18 (Wed) 13:54:08 No.58
TODAY, former President Barack HUSSEIN Obama formally retained counsel (9/WW).
GOD BLESS YOU ALL.
Q ______________________________ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2qIXXafxCQ
(Excerpt) Read more at qcodefag.github.io ...
:)
BTW, I’ve seen absolutely no evidence from you that you have any realistic scientific appreciation for the fact that you are building up an incredible backlog of probability to get bit in the rear by a false negative error. Is your understanding of the scientific need to balance the two types of errors that lacking?
Insults are not my language. They are antithetical to my language.
But again, your misrepresentation of me is noted.
Dude. She’s got you pegged. Stop dancing.
Opinion discarded.
Into the trash it goes.
No need for any misrepresentation. Y’all faithfully post the incongruencies, rigidities, narrowness routinely—virtually obsessively.
:)
Yes and no. You are not as brazenly insulting as a number of your cohorts hereon. However, in context, many of your sentences are fairly insufferable.
You’ve seen no evidence.
On this we agree.
(To see evidence, you would need to take an honest look. That step is the missing ingredient.)
Flamboyant limp-wristed personalities gravitate towards one another, I guess ;)
Haha. I don’t care. You saw it, that’s all the matters. Better yet, everybody else did too. Let the mockery continue.
If you are talking about someone else, I have no comment. If you’re talking about me, then you couldn’t be more mistaken.
‘However, in context, many of your sentences are fairly insufferable.’
For example?
Your assertions about what is acceptable evidence etc. sounds like a Roman Catholic deeply awash in Maryolatry pretending to have a dialogue with a Pentecostal fiercely opposed to Maryolatry.
The RC awash in such is often intensely rigid, narrow, biased about what is acceptable evidence and consigns all who disagree as on a greased slide to hell.
That attitude comes across clearly in many of your postings in terms of what acceptable evidence is.
You are not some global or galactic Pontifical Supreme Court in charge of defining what is acceptable evidence--except for your own sensibilities--with all their flaws.
Dude. You claim to have looked at the Dec 14 drop and say you didn’t see the line about the seven guy meeting. You are either lying or dumber than you sound. I’m going with lying. so let’s not talk about evidence, shall we?
I have been receiving emails asking “Who is Q.” I’ll post some prior threads for people wondering. The first post would be enough to get an idea. I’m posting the others in case anyone else is looking for an old link. I couldn’t find the link for an OP I wrote (Q drop #583, “Onward, united as one, into the storm!”) asking FReepers to prepare for disturbing WH releases of info re pedophilia/trafficking. It may have been pulled if I did not adequately contexualize my remarks or judged not appropriate for FR. If I mistaken, would a FReeper send me the link to that article? :)
Here are a few FR links in sequence that might help (title and link).
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3623181/posts
Q Anon: Increasing levels of disinformation and trolling
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3625060/posts
My Notes: Pedophilia in the D.C. Swamp, A Friendly Caution to FReepers
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3623515/posts
Interviewing Liz Crokin on The Storm, QAnon, Pedogate, & Twitter Feuds (Jan 2, 2018)
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3625094/posts
Q Post believed to be President Trump’s words to prepare you for today
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3623792/posts
Q Drops #541-#547 & #549 dated 1/18/2018:photo gallery of (in)famous people
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3623904/posts
Q Anon: Some housekeeping rules that will keep the place tidy
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3624379/posts
Q drop #29: Reason for cryptic format, North Korea is “directed”, pedophiles
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3624494/posts
Q Anon: What lies ahead and how might we able to be a source of support
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3624518/posts
Q drop #153 (stirring words re Trump’s decision to seek office,Hillary’s reaction)
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3625427/posts
Q drop #597 (FBI:first meeting of “secret society” on the night Trump won election)
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3625424/posts
Q Ping: The New World Order’s plan to kill most of us and makes survivors slaves
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3625045/posts
Q - TRUST Adm R. He played the game to remain in control.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3624983/posts
new q post
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3624588/posts
Q Anon - More about Q Drop #556. Is this “Checkmate”?
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3624322/posts
One more post from Q
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3623882/posts
Am not into that level of tedious search and hunt what is now ancient history on these threads. If I read such again from you, I’ll point it out to you.
Hell, yeah. The presidency was really too easy for him, he wasn't even challenged by it he's so smart. He needs some kind of higher office or something to really let his intellect come out.
Maybe "Inmate of the Year" at Leavenworth?
It's good.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.