To: BenLurkin
They are not driverless. That is a marketing lie. The manufacturer tells you that there must be a licensed driver in the driver’s seat who must be ready to take over at any time. That is not driverless.
There is no way to stop this stupidity. They are not going to listen to us. The manufacturers are going to woo the politicians who see in it another way to control the public and to gather data that they can use to tax the hell out of the public.
26 posted on
01/24/2018 7:37:12 AM PST by
I want the USA back
(Doing more of what fails is the definition of liberalism and insanity.)
To: I want the USA back
The manufacturers are going to woo the politicians who see in it another way to control the public and to gather data that they can use to tax the hell out of the public. I absolutely see driverless cars as an assault on Freedom. I think it's pretty scary that this is being pushed so much.
53 posted on
01/24/2018 7:58:27 AM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(Benedict McCain is the worst traitor ever to wear the uniform of the US military.)
To: I want the USA back
They are not driverless. That is a marketing lie. The manufacturer tells you that there must be a licensed driver in the driver’s seat who must be ready to take over at any time. For now...
60 posted on
01/24/2018 8:05:42 AM PST by
WayneS
(An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
To: I want the USA back
The manufacturer tells you that there must be a licensed driver in the driver’s seat who must be ready to take over at any time. That is insane. If the driver has to be sufficiently attentive to take over EFFECTIVELY at any time, he might as well have his hands on the wheel and his foot on a pedal and be driving. To heck with the robot.
62 posted on
01/24/2018 8:07:47 AM PST by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson