[bagster]

That link you provided cites another meeting in December.

My revised position is this. Q talked about a meeting of seven guys in a guarded location the night AFTER THE ELECTION on NOVEMBER 14.

I say that, if that is confirmed, and I think it soon will be by the Senators snitch, then that is DEFINITE Q confirmation. I would like some solid to push in the face of the Q deniers.

Am I wrong or off base?

[Cboldt]

I think you're logic there is fine. If independent evidence surfaces that there was a secret anti-Trump meeting of 7 government players the night of election, then Q's credibility is pretty well burnished. At least for that post!

[Washi]

I would like some solid to push in the face of the Q deniers.

I'd be more than happy to believe if there WERE something solid.

Why are you such a strong supporter in the absence of something solid?

[Bigg Red]

Day after the election in 2016 would not be 14 NOV. Election was 8 NOV.