Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster
I think you're logic there is fine. If independent evidence surfaces that there was a secret anti-Trump meeting of 7 government players the night of election, then Q's credibility is pretty well burnished. At least for that post!
103 posted on 01/23/2018 9:42:37 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
Yay. Thank you. I was questioning myself. At this point, if there was in fact such a meeting. Lots of people know about, as confirmed by Senator Johnson to Brett Baire last night. If he knows about it, tons know about it. That truth is out there. And Q knew about it on November 14, six days after it took place. A pretty high level intelligence guy would only know that, right?

I contend that if he is confirmed on that ONE post. He is credible on ALL of them. Except the misinformation ones put out the the deep state, of course. The real Q is real in my book. I'm positive the meeting took place. But I will wait for confirmation before I go ALL in. I hold back one percent credibility factor.

106 posted on 01/23/2018 9:47:37 PM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson