[bagster]

Yay. Thank you. I was questioning myself. At this point, if there was in fact such a meeting. Lots of people know about, as confirmed by Senator Johnson to Brett Baire last night. If he knows about it, tons know about it. That truth is out there. And Q knew about it on November 14, six days after it took place. A pretty high level intelligence guy would only know that, right?

I contend that if he is confirmed on that ONE post. He is credible on ALL of them. Except the misinformation ones put out the the deep state, of course. The real Q is real in my book. I'm positive the meeting took place. But I will wait for confirmation before I go ALL in. I hold back one percent credibility factor.

[Cboldt]

Even people with firsthand knowledge aren't perfect, and if Q is "close to but not in" each action, there is even more risk of error.

My point is to not demand perfection in order to assign credibility.

I haven't followed Q at all, until maybe a day ago, and I'm just picking things up on the fly with no intention to research "all of it." I'm intrigued by it, but find the tidbits in the news (and Trump tweets) to have more "punch."