To: Red Badger
Lots of wild claims represented as facts. Settled science or more mathemagic?
Let’s see them put their hypothesis to a falsifiable test.
2 posted on
01/19/2018 1:44:14 PM PST by
Zuse
(I am disrupted! I am offended! I am insulted! I am outraged!)
To: Red Badger
I thought the existence of black holes was in doubt.
3 posted on
01/19/2018 1:46:13 PM PST by
dsc
(Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
To: Red Badger
It created ripples in the fabric of space-time
Well, get out the old space-time iron and iron it down.
Maybe a little starch would help.
5 posted on
01/19/2018 1:55:02 PM PST by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: Red Badger
What is the mass limit of crappy countries before they become shitholes?
To: Red Badger
CNN: Physics fat shames Neutron Stars into massive weight loss until they become a racist term.
To: Red Badger
This whole article is blatant white-privilege racism using the excuse of “...light not being able to be observed...” as a reason to call a hole in space-time a “black” hole.
17 posted on
01/19/2018 2:32:02 PM PST by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
To: Red Badger
Most neutron stars are between one and two solar masses.In a sphere about 12 miles across. These are some of the most fascinating objects in the universe.
I wonder, if you could ever get close enough to even see one, before this happens:
A Neutron Star Is Not Your Friend
18 posted on
01/19/2018 2:42:22 PM PST by
Drew68
To: Red Badger
You can make Dyson spheres out of neutron matter or a Doomsday machine.

To: Red Badger
Perhaps someone with more physics knowledge than me can answer the following question, based on my physics knowledge:
- Gravity is based on the amount of mass in a body, not the size of the body
- A star has a certain amount of gravity, but by no means is it black-hole strong
- A dying star, after burning most of its mass over billions of years, explodes and can become a black hole
Given the above, where does the extra mass come from when a star explodes, expelling a lot of mass away from it? There must be more mass because black holes have more gravity.
25 posted on
01/19/2018 4:08:29 PM PST by
ShadowAce
(Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Red Badger
Wow, what a coincidence! Me and my buddies were discussing the mass limit for neutron stars just this past Friday night in the bar after bowling.......
34 posted on
01/22/2018 4:41:48 PM PST by
Hot Tabasco
(My cat is not fat, she is just big boned........)
To: Red Badger
This is called the TolmanOppenheimerVolkoff limit, named after the three physicists who first calculated it in the 1930s. They came up with a value between 1.5 and 3 solar masses.
In 2007 a pular with 2.01 solar masses was found, which set a new lower limit. Then some researchers in 2017 set a new upper limit of 2.17, which I think is what the article might be talking about.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/TolmanOppenheimerVolkoff_limit
This figure is for the residual mass. About 90% of the original mass gets blown into space.
37 posted on
01/23/2018 12:29:07 PM PST by
Gideon7
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson