Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jennifer Garner isn’t a bad-looking man
New York Post ^ | January 3, 2018 | Derrick Bryson Taylor

Posted on 01/03/2018 3:44:00 PM PST by nickcarraway

Jennifer Garner made her debut as a man on Tuesday.

The 45-year-old actress posted a snap to Instagram in which she’s made up to look like a man — and not a bad-looking one!

SNIP

But the hashtags Garner added revealed more details. It turns out the snap was from a 2011 film that was never made because she discovered she was pregnant.

(Excerpt) Read more at pagesix.com ...


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: cinema; film; jennifergarner; movies; television; tv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: gundog

LOL I knew that face was familiar!


21 posted on 01/03/2018 4:29:55 PM PST by TigersEye (0bama. The Legacy is a lie. The lie is the Legacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vendome; Lazamataz

Looks feminine from the nose up.

What does Laz have to say?


22 posted on 01/03/2018 4:33:10 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

I’ve always thought that she is a very desirable woman. Affleck is an idiot and a POS.


23 posted on 01/03/2018 4:43:08 PM PST by namvolunteer (Obama says the US is subservient to the UN and the Constitution does not apply. That is treason.9we)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: namvolunteer

ditto


24 posted on 01/03/2018 4:45:15 PM PST by Lib-Lickers 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

Who are you - Laz?


25 posted on 01/03/2018 4:50:47 PM PST by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gundog

“Not a ‘bad looking’ man”??? I guess that is very much a matter of opinion. In my opinion, NOT a “good looking” man, at all.

Also, it is IMPOSSIBLE to say in truthfulness, ever that any woman “IS” a XXXXXX (you fill it in) “looking man”, because a man she is not.

It MIGHT be truthful to say a particular woman “looks like” a man of some particular view (when made up cosmetically for it), but never that she “IS” such a man.

Therefore, it is a gross error to say Jennifer Garner “is not” a bad looking man, for a man “IS or “IS NOT” does not apply to her, only to her looks.


26 posted on 01/03/2018 4:56:11 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

Better lookin....Way....


27 posted on 01/03/2018 4:57:42 PM PST by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

I didn’t say she looked like a man....I said she looked like James Franco. /wiseass


28 posted on 01/03/2018 5:05:24 PM PST by gundog (Hail to the Chief, bitches.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: gundog

The TITLE says “Jennifer Garner isn’t a bad-looking man”.

The error is a language error of the NY Post, not yours.

You are too sensitive.

THEIR heading errors. It says she “IS” not a bad-looking man. She is NOT a man at all and cannot be a man no matter how she looks. Their heading should have said “Jennifer Garner looks like a not bad looking man”. “Looks like a man” she can be, “is” a man in any sense she cannot be (other than a “pretend” man).


29 posted on 01/03/2018 5:17:47 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Gah, man, why did they have to do that. Why.

Why can’t women just be frikking women, and man be damned men?

Gawd, I hate this crap.


30 posted on 01/03/2018 5:24:29 PM PST by rlmorel (Leftists: American Liberty is the egg that requires breaking to make their Utopian omelette.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
Yep!!

Totally agree...........

31 posted on 01/03/2018 5:28:02 PM PST by Osage Orange (Watch your six.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Yeah, I’m too sensitive. *eyerolll*


32 posted on 01/03/2018 5:38:55 PM PST by gundog (Hail to the Chief, bitches.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

33 posted on 01/03/2018 6:20:46 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
I argue with my brother everytime one of her commercials comes on - I say she's hot, he disagrees.

When she's a woman, I mean.

34 posted on 01/03/2018 6:27:44 PM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

Jennifer is hot ... as a woman.
https://twitter.com/twitter/statuses/948725398199783424

(See the 5:18 PM 03 JAN 2018 Tweet...)


35 posted on 01/03/2018 6:34:35 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Thicken the beard a bit and she could pass as the older brother of a young guy I work with. Outstanding job by the makeup people.


36 posted on 01/03/2018 6:50:26 PM PST by ThunderSleeps (Doing my part to help make America great again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

This is odd.

I have this notion she is an extremely attractive woman, and I was going to post a picture of her from the movie “Draft Day”, but...when I looked at some still pictures, not a single one of them was attractive to me!

Strange.

It is as if, seeing her animated in a movie where she isn’t “still”, she is gorgeous, but in looking at all the still pictures, she looked almost unattractive.


37 posted on 01/03/2018 7:21:21 PM PST by rlmorel (Leftists: American Liberty is the egg that requires breaking to make their Utopian omelette.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

I think...now and again...even the best looking men and women...have their bad moments....


38 posted on 01/03/2018 7:47:07 PM PST by Osage Orange (Watch your six.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

And why are we excited about this??? Idiots.


39 posted on 01/03/2018 8:10:52 PM PST by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

CREEPY


40 posted on 01/04/2018 7:53:06 AM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson