Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/15/2017 8:51:03 AM PST by COBOL2Java
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: COBOL2Java

bfl


2 posted on 12/15/2017 8:52:57 AM PST by Skooz (Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

Ping!...................


3 posted on 12/15/2017 8:57:40 AM PST by Red Badger (Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

This story has a great narrative that fits perfectly in the good Professor’s book. The problem with great narratives is that the facts never fit perfectly into them. The first iPhone was an evolutionary product that borrowed a great deal from other devices that were previously conceived by others.

It had an improved touch screen that was a little better than other phones of its time period. But the only thing truly revolutionary about the first iPhone was Apple’s extraordinary marketing effort. This successful marketing effort led to previously unimaginable profits for electronic trinkets. The pursuit of profits altered the direction of cell phone development and research.


5 posted on 12/15/2017 9:48:46 AM PST by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

Here’s a truism that has been proven time and time again: Innovation depends on the ability to exploit uniqueness. Whether it’s an iPhone or a new drug, the enormous development and up-front design, tooling, testing, and certification costs have to paid for somehow of the company is to remain viable. The best way for manufacturers to do that is for the product to be so differentiated and unique that there is no competition, at least for a while. This is why patents exist, after all - to give the innovator an “unfair advantage” in order to receive a return on his investment and innovation.

Consumers love standards because they can pick and choose interoperable solutions. Manufacturers hate standards because it drives products toward commoditization, i.e. a race to the bottom. When the value of one product is no different than another, customers usually buy the cheapest one. Coke vs Pepsi is a good example where the differences are fiercely maintained in order to differentiate product that some people can’t tell apart based on taste. But they both maintain strong brands.

Apple deserves credit for threading this needle very successfully, their “Apple ecosystem” delivers value that their customers are willing...no, happy - to pay for.


6 posted on 12/15/2017 10:01:37 AM PST by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; 5thGenTexan; AbolishCSEU; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; ...
Apple violated Net Neutrality, which of course did not exist in 2007 in introducing the iPhone. — PING!


Apple
Ping!

The latest Apple/Mac/iOS Pings can be found by searching Keyword "ApplePingList" on FreeRepublic's Search.

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me

7 posted on 12/15/2017 10:24:35 AM PST by Swordmaker (My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you racist, bigot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson