Skip to comments.
New
The Storm To Restore The Constitutional Republic of the United States of America
youtube.com ^
| Dec 7, 2017
| roypotterqa
Posted on 12/07/2017 6:19:16 PM PST by ransomnote
Video at link. It's 41 minutes in length.
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: constitution; deepstate; trump
It's long (41 minutes) and he kind of rambles in some parts. Yet I recommend it to those who could do with a shot of Old Tyme patriotism. He is retired army. Among other things, he talks about Trump's efforts to return to the rule of law. I don't agree with everything he says (e.g., religion) but by the time he featured the Star Spangled Banner playing while displaying an American flag at the end, I was deeply moved. It made me realize that witnessing so many years of corruption had led me to sadly reminisce about the America that was lost, "I knew her when...." The corruption and violation of the rule of law - Obama was only the most obvious - others have been equally harmful or worse. When they groomed Obama, they got lazy. He was openly indifferent to law. He couldn't be bothered to pretend to even tolerate America. He couldn't force his hand over his heart during the Star Spangled Banner. Watching the video - it was like the old days for a little while. I needed to hear it.
To: ransomnote
Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen.
BOTH parties colluded to violate the Constitution with the Kenyanesian Usurpation.
Restoring the Constitution requires righting that wrong.
The founders insisted on someone who was naturally an American because they couldn’t possibly be anything else, born here of citizen parents.
They meant to specifically exclude the children of foreign nationals who would naturally have divided loyalties.
2
posted on
12/07/2017 6:24:29 PM PST
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
To: Lurkinanloomin
The U.S. Constitution uses but does not define the phrase "natural born Citizen", and various opinions have been offered over time regarding its precise meaning. The consensus of early 21st-century constitutional scholars, together with relevant case law, is that natural-born citizens include, subject to exceptions, those born in the United States. Many scholars have also concluded that those who meet the legal requirements for U.S. citizenship "at the moment of birth", regardless of place of birth, are also natural-born citizens.
I find no 'exception' such that the nationality of the parents is a factor.
3
posted on
12/07/2017 6:29:21 PM PST
by
sparklite2
(I hereby designate the ongoing kerfuffle Diddle-Gate.)
To: Lurkinanloomin
It will end up like the O.J. trial.
4
posted on
12/07/2017 6:29:38 PM PST
by
DIRTYSECRET
(urope. Why do they put up with this.)
To: sparklite2
They did not define “shall not be infringed” either, but I still know what it means.
Students of the founders and history know what it means even if lawyers want it to be different.
5
posted on
12/07/2017 6:35:49 PM PST
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
To: sparklite2
The same consensus finds that the Constitution protects infanticide.
6
posted on
12/07/2017 6:37:15 PM PST
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
To: sparklite2
... together with relevant case law, is that natural-born citizens include, subject to exceptions, those born in the United States. A baby born of a mother illegally in the country, with no allegiance to the country, is not "natural born". I know democRats want them to be. "Subject to the jurisdiction of" is defined in statute, and can be easily fixed with the change of one word. The only thing lacking is the will to do so/
7
posted on
12/07/2017 6:49:49 PM PST
by
MileHi
(Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
To: ransomnote
8
posted on
12/07/2017 6:50:02 PM PST
by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(Screw The NFL!!!!!! My family fought for the flag!)
To: Lurkinanloomin
Barack nobama was also sharia compliant.
Sharia has its own constitution which is not a competing constitution, as it seeks to dominate. Dominate globally. This is why they cannot plead allegiance to the flag nor constitution and they should be considered enemy combatants.
9
posted on
12/07/2017 7:00:18 PM PST
by
himno hero
(hadnuff)
To: ransomnote
10
posted on
12/07/2017 7:03:35 PM PST
by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(Screw The NFL!!!!!! My family fought for the flag!)
To: himno hero
Trump could, whenever he wants, have Ozero arrested and confined to GITMO. After that, he could let the Kenyan-born usurper rot there, or subject him to a military tribunal. I’m sure our legitimate president is simply biding his time, knowing he has that in his back pocket. In the meantime, Ozero’s judicial appointments are illegitimate and should be replaced immediately.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson