The U.S. Constitution uses but does not define the phrase "natural born Citizen", and various opinions have been offered over time regarding its precise meaning. The consensus of early 21st-century constitutional scholars, together with relevant case law, is that natural-born citizens include, subject to exceptions, those born in the United States. Many scholars have also concluded that those who meet the legal requirements for U.S. citizenship "at the moment of birth", regardless of place of birth, are also natural-born citizens.I find no 'exception' such that the nationality of the parents is a factor.
They did not define “shall not be infringed” either, but I still know what it means.
Students of the founders and history know what it means even if lawyers want it to be different.
The same consensus finds that the Constitution protects infanticide.
A baby born of a mother illegally in the country, with no allegiance to the country, is not "natural born". I know democRats want them to be. "Subject to the jurisdiction of" is defined in statute, and can be easily fixed with the change of one word. The only thing lacking is the will to do so/