Vanity: CNN Doctors Photograph of Moore Accuser's Yearbook

Vanity (CNN Fake News)

[TigerClaws]

Here's exhibit 1. CNN's link to an image of the Moore accuser's yearbook. Look at the color of the writing.

https://mobile.twitter.com/cnnbrk/status/930945041299853313

But (exhibit 2) click on the image in the link. You can clearly see two different color ink pens were used.

https://mobile.twitter.com/CNN/status/930205088299257859

[Yardstick]

Right, unless it was slightly cracked open due to the page being creased or the spine being a little warped something.

[RegulatorCountry]

I have no idea what you’re on about, nopardons.

Sure, show me your yearbook. Show me how I’m stupid in thinking that new ink on old paper might show up differently in a photo than old ink that’s been on that same paper for forty years.

You sure are a cranky old crab, you know that?

[Flaming Conservative]

The writing itself rhymes with “Ray” (not Roy)

Wow, you’re right! I hadn’t seen that!

[Aliska]

Oops, went to watch it specifically because of that (Allred saying Ray). Thanks for the link.

After telling her story, Allred showed an artist's rendition in color, couldn't tell the medium, didn't think chalk, she had done at 6 Flags or some amusement park when she was 16.

The main point I want to make is I didn't know for sure if what we have been seeing was the actual yearbook page or a photocopy.

Allred held up what looked like a hinged book, an actual yearbook. Interestingly, the video cameras did not render the writing in black and blue. So the blue will remain a mystery for now, certainly a clean demarcation between the different colors. I did think the Moore part on the blue side looked close enough to be his but not the rest of it.

At least three times, Allred called for a Senate hearing, and her client would testify voluntarily under oath. We already know, well take Moore's word for that, she did see him again, and she'd have to be multiple personality not to know it was the same DA (who never was a DA?) who allegedly assaulted her some years before.

Roy Moore had seen her before obviously, in divorce court, but she would have had a different name, aged significantly, and likely a different hair style. I believe he said he had never seen her before, didn't know her. She still lives in Alabama she said.

Someone suggested they could have photocopies the additions onto the yearbook page. I don't know how that would be done.

She's not interested in pursuing criminal or civil lawsuits. Statute of limitations surely would have expired on the criminal angle; often victims may pursue civil suits. Allred also managed to get Filner, the San Diego mayor to resign, said she worked on Weiner, Clinton, emphasized she was a Democrat and litigated against Democrats in women sex abuse cases. I had never seen Allred in action before.

[Lopeover]

GOPe wants to lose control of Congress in order to allow Democrats to vote to impeach President Trump.

[nopardons]

Of course you don't know what I'm talking about...you have your mind set on your own imaginings.

I'm neither "cranky" nor an "old crab". What I am is logical, reasonable, and don't try to make up things to prove my own suppositions.

[nopardons]

Do you have old yearbooks?

If so, are they out and about, with cracked or folded pages where sunlight shines on them ?

Most people keep such things in a bookcase, in a box in a closet, in an attic, in a basement, maybe in a desk, away from sunlight; if they keep them at all.

Because of all of this talk, I decided to look at some old yearbooks and no, the ink hasn't changed over the years; especially in just one part of a message.

This accuser's story smells to high heaven and in so many different ways!

[Yosemitest]

You're welcome.

Think about what the retired law enforcement officer said on Rush's Show on Wednesday's Show, Nov 15, 2017.
Here's an excerpt from Rush Limbaugh's Radio Show:

The Swamp Demands Conformity
Nov 15, 2017

...
RUSH: Here’s Mark in Port Townsend — where’s Port Townsend ?
Port Townsend what?

CALLER: That’s a little bit west of Seattle.

RUSH: In Washington.
Okay. Great to have you with us.
How you doing, sir ?

CALLER: I’m doing great, sir.
I hope you’re doing well yourself.

RUSH: I am under siege today, Mark.
I’m under siege.
The Drive-By Media is after me because I dared to point out that Roy Moore used to be a Democrat.

CALLER: That’s why you get paid the big bucks.
I’m envious of you.

RUSH: (laughing).

CALLER: So the comment I wanted to make was that as a retired law enforcement officer, Jeff Sessions —
I’m speaking as a retired law enforcement officer
— Jeff Sessions says he doesn’t see any reason to doubt these girls’ word.
Well, I see a really good reason.
None of these girls have been put under oath and made a sworn statement under penalty of perjury.
And Gloria Allred should be able to tell you
that is the first thing you do when you get a client,
you depose them and you get their statement on the record,
and then you go from there.
And if they’re not willing to make a sworn statement, that sounds really fishy to me.

RUSH: I take it you don’t believe the women
or you just don’t have enough information yet to make a determination ?

CALLER: You don’t have enough information to make a determination,
but speaking as an ex-cop, I find it fishy that nobody has made a sworn statement.
And about that yearbook thing,
you know, when I was in uniform at a certain time of year
you’d get kids walking up to you all the time wanting you to sign their yearbook.
“Hey, Officer Mark, sign my yearbook.”
And I was only a cop.
Can you imagine how politicians get kids wanting —
doesn’t mean you remember all of them.

RUSH: Hang on.
On the yearbook stuff, folks, for those of you who may not be up to speed on this —
and I doubt there are very many of you
— there are allegations that some of these autographs in yearbooks are forged.
There are conservative blog sites claiming to have evidence by virtue of side-by-side comparison
that somebody other than Judge Moore signed some of these things.
This is the first I’ve mentioned that.
I’m just reacting to you bringing up the yearbooks.

You’re upset with Jeff Sessions.
He’s the attorney general, and he is going ahead and acknowledging that
he believes witnesses before anybody’s been put under oath,
and you think that’s a little unprofessional, right ?

CALLER: It sounds to me like he’s just trying to tread carefully.

RUSH: Well, look, this is politics.
It has its own court, and it’s not a court of law.

CALLER: But these girls are making public statements —

RUSH: They are women.
They are women.

CALLER: Okay, they’re making public statements impugning somebody’s honor.
And somebody with responsibility needs to explain to them,
if you’re gonna besmirch somebody, you gotta put it on the record.

RUSH: No, you don’t.
Only in court.
And this is not in court.
This is in politics.

CALLER: I understand it’s politics,
but Gloria Allred should know what the law is.

RUSH: I’m sure she does.
That’s why she’s not in court and is instead on TV.

CALLER: I just want to make that point, Rush.
Thank you.

RUSH: I’m glad you called, Mark.
Folks, I have to tell you,
I’m having a little fun with this.
No, don’t misunderstand here,
but he’s exactly right, but of course that doesn’t —
there’s a whole different inertia and movement now that is taking place in the world of politics,
and there is no room for doubt.
I mean,
the guy did it, you don’t disbelieve the women.
I mean, that’s something you must subscribe to now.
The women don’t lie,
except if you’re Juanita Broaddrick,
then of course…
that’s the point.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: I was having fun with the caller and his obvious consternation
by confusing what happens in politics with what happens in the law,which is ironic,
because the laws are written by these people.
But what happens there
apparently the law doesn’t matter first and foremost.
Find it funny.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Steve in Rochester, Minnesota.
Great to have you with us, sir.
How are you ?

CALLER: Hey, good.
Thanks, Rush. Dittos.
I’ve been listening since 1991.
So I was reading through a Fox News story on the various senators,
Republican senators and their comments about this whole situation,
and I read read ’em one after another; there were many.
And I was thinking as I got most of the way through it,
this sounds a lot like your media montages, vis-a-vis gravitas,
that I often hear on your show.
The similarities were striking in what they said.
And it was an observation that led me to think that
this is really a coordinated attack.
And I think that should be the focus, not the “he said, she said,”
but the fact that
this guy’s being attacked by the establishment, big time.

RUSH: Let me put it to you another way in the form of a question.
Interesting observation, by the way, that you,
in reading and listening to all of the different people opposing Judge Moore,
they’re all saying the same thing, is that your point ?
Just like when Cheney was mentioned as the potential vice presidential nominee for George W. Bush,
about 85 media people all said,
“That’s gravitas.
This is to provide gravitas.”
They all had that word.
You think the same thing’s happening here with the response to Judge Moore ?

CALLER: Yes.
Exactly.

RUSH: Okay.
So do you think —
let me just ask you point-blank
— do you think that, whether he did it or not, he’s being railroaded ?

CALLER: Yes.

RUSH: Interesting.

CALLER: Yep. I think this is a coordinated attack,
and what spurred me to think this
was your comments yesterday about Mitch McConnell attacking Bannon’s choice.
And I thought
how else could you do this ?
Here we are a month away from the election.

RUSH: Let me tell you something.
I don’t think there’s any doubt here.
When Bannon went public and said that
Judge Moore was the first of many candidates they’re gonna support
in order to oust the Republican leadership,
I don’t think there’s any question here that McConnell’s reacting to that.

Let me just ask you this.
Have any of you ever,
do you ever remember Mitch McConnell or the Republican leadership ever going after a Democrat
the way they’re going after — (interruption)
You don’t remember.
You don’t remember McConnell ever going after a Democrat the way they’re going after …

[RegulatorCountry]

Fluff answer with BS bluster. You understand nothing about what I wrote, that much is clear. Why it gets your crank on is a mystery, though.

[Yosemitest]

I'm pretty sure that the lower "77" handwriting belongs to Roy Moore's assistant, Deborah Adams.

[RegulatorCountry]

Delbra. Odd name, yes, but that’s the correct spelling.

[nopardons]

It sounds as though you are doing "crank".

I understood what you posted; it was hardly anything too difficult to understand.LOL

[Yosemitest]

I have a very dear friend from long ago that was named "Deborah", and that spelling has a very, very old history.

[RegulatorCountry]

Well, then, maybe you can paraphrase it. What meaning did I convey with the reply in question, that has you in your typical late night crank mode? Tell me what I wrote in your own words and furthermore explain just why the hell you’re snapping my head off when we’re in agreement. See? The stupid is on your end.

[fireman15]

And as you know the DA in the forgery are his assistant’s initials. The lady with the yearbook had a sample of his signature to work with from her divorce papers... Judge Moore presided over her divorce. On those papers his assistant used a stamp to produce his signature and then initialed it. The forger thought that the DA was part of the judge’s signature.

[Yosemitest]

"On those papers his assistant used a stamp to produce his signature and then initialed it."

I was NOT aware that Deborah Adams used a stamp to produce that signature.

Do you have a link that would verify that it came from a stamp ?

[RegulatorCountry]

It’s SOP for assistants and secretaries to initial a stamped signature. Why would she initial his actual signature? There would be no need to authenticate since the signature would be genuine rather than a proxy.

[RegulatorCountry]

I understand about the Biblical history of the name Deborah. However, Roy Moore’s assistant was named “Delbra.”

[Yosemitest]

Thanks for the correction.
I've just now figured that out.
The first link I found had the name wrong.
Heres two more links with that name you mentioned.

And here’s one more source:

Live Stream: Moore Campaign Holding Press Conference

“ … Furthermore, after Moore's signature are the initials "D.A.," which Nelson and her attorney say represented were written by Moore because he was district attorney at the time.
But Moore was an assistant district attorney, Jauregui said,
And Moore can't recall ever signing his name with the letters "D.A." after it.
But he had seen it before, Jauregui said, when he was on the bench.

His assistant Delver Adams stamped his signature on papers and then put "D.A." on them, Jauregui said.
That's exactly how the signature appears on the divorce decree that Moore signed, he added. … ”

Here’s one more source:

Embattled GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore's attorney implies his signature in a girl's high school yearbook was a forgery

“ … "Judge Moore looked at that D.A. after that signature," Jauregui said. "No, he wasn't, he was the assistant district attorney."
He added that Moore's assistant when he was presiding over Nelson's divorce proceedings was named Delver Adams,
who typically stamped his initials on court filings. … ”

[octex]

Yep. They are the same a and the guy who signed her book was named Ray.

The “M”s are significantly different.

The “D.A.” was copied from Moore’s assistant after she rubber stamped his signature on court documents, and were HER initials.

Why are so many GOPers in Congress not acknowledging facts?