I was astounded when she ranted that there was compelling evidence to go to trial. I got so torqued off I turned the channel.
Sean brags about how he has a team investigating all the Dem and Clinton collusion but Fox doesn't have anybody with half a brain who can at least see what is on the Internet then go out and follow up some of those leads and suppositions? I guess not.
I haven't watched Fox since I spent the night watching FBN on election night in 2016 then about two weeks ago I snooped around and they seemed to be pretty dead on with there reporting and commentary. After this Moore stuff I will stop watching again.
“I got so torqued off I turned the channel.”
Ditto for me. When Judge Jeanine went on her rant before knowing true evidence, that’s when I turned the channel. I went to Investigation Discovery — a much more uplifting station dealing with less disturbing issues like murder and rape.
BTW, today another FReeper posted a link to an article of Jeanine proudly marching in a gay rights parade a few years ago. I’m going to have to re-think some things after knowing that.
I know what you mean, Fox will disappoint as often as it satisfies these days. It is almost as though the conservative crowd decided to throw Moore under the bus for the sake of Media Matters calling off their dogs. (It really looks like Sean and all the rest took a giant step back in the face of this challenge.) Unless they all know something we don’t know.
Lou seems to still be in the Moore camp but is very down on Sessions. All this frightens me because the yearbook ploy is such a simple trick to find a solid something that could go as evidence. All the rest is fantasy or outright lying. But the yearbook was a scam and modified to fit their purpose. How convenient that it had the restaurant and the date and his job (which I believe was ADA), It is almost like it was tailor made to incriminate him.
I do realize that Moore was looking for younger (than his age) partners and eventually found and married his wife who is considerably younger than he is. But who in their right mind can put together the facts of early encounters well enough to ruin an almost 40 year career in the courts.