Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP lawmaker calls for Mueller to be fired on House floor
The Hill ^ | November 8, 2017 | Brandon Carter

Posted on 11/08/2017 2:08:09 PM PST by Golden Eagle

In a speech on the House floor Wednesday, Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) called for special counsel Robert Mueller to resign or be fired over his “indisputable conflicts of interest.”

“We are at risk of a coup d'état in this country if we allow an unaccountable person with no oversight to undermine the duly-elected President of the United States,” Gaetz said. “That is precisely what is happening right now with the indisputable conflicts of interest that are present with Mr. Mueller and others at the Department of Justice.”

“I join … in calling for Mr. Mueller’s resignation or his firing,” Gaetz continued.

Last week, Gaetz introduced a resolution that argues Mueller is compromised because he served as FBI director when the Obama administration signed off on a deal allowing a Russian company to purchase a Canadian energy company with uranium operations in the U.S. in 2010.

“These deeply troubling events took place when Mr. Mueller was the Director of the FBI. As such, his impartiality is hopelessly compromised. He must step down immediately,” Gaetz said in a statement Friday.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: mueller; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Architect of Avalon
Why are Democratic fantasies about Trump being investigated when malfeasance by Obama, Clinton as SoS, Clinton as candidate, the Clinton Foundation, and the DNC are not when there is a Republican President / Senate / House?

Uhm, what is "getting Muellered" for a thousand Alex?

21 posted on 11/08/2017 2:56:15 PM PST by Kudsman ( Anyone to the Right of Stalin is a Far Right Wing candidate to the Far Left Wing Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Major Matt Mason
If you are of the thinking that Mueller was flipped due to his involvement in Uranium One...

And exactly why would anyone think this? Because they would like to think that's what he should do? Doesn't excuse their devotion to defending all things Mueller, nor their attacks on good conservatives like Gaetz and Ghomert.

22 posted on 11/08/2017 2:58:18 PM PST by Golden Eagle ("A lot of people are disappointed in the Justice Department, including me" - Trump on Nov 3, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

Can anybody do a pic of a guy with a flame thrower in Congress?


23 posted on 11/08/2017 3:00:59 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

Who Mueller thinks he is working for may not be congruent with who he is accomplishing work for.


24 posted on 11/08/2017 3:03:02 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

If Paul Ryan had the guts to say the same thing, Trump could fire Mueller and it would be the end of this attempted coup. Instead, Ryan supports the coup.


25 posted on 11/08/2017 3:04:48 PM PST by Defiant (It's not antifa, it's actually antifafa. Antifa Fascists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

I second that emotion.


26 posted on 11/08/2017 3:05:04 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

.
Said the certified Idiot Supreme!
.


27 posted on 11/08/2017 3:07:18 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

Good for him


28 posted on 11/08/2017 3:23:12 PM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

Gaetz for Speaker! He knocks it out of the park in this interview on OAN also from today.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keQqwoEnZqA


29 posted on 11/08/2017 3:33:26 PM PST by Golden Eagle ("A lot of people are disappointed in the Justice Department, including me" - Trump on Nov 3, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Thank you Matt, might I make a slight suggestion though?

I think right now you should call for Special Counsel to investigate Uranium One.

That way you can call Mueller to testify on his involvement, if any, beyond personally delivering an enriched uranium sample to Russia? Was the previous administration informed of the Russian bribing scandal before the deal was ultimately approved? Why were lesser charges eventually the charge leveled against this Russian who was involved in the bribery scheme?

It would also enable you to depose Hillary and her involvement in the deal, and the exact amount that was donated to her foundation, on or around that period of time, and who made those donations? Can it be determined if those donations were quid pro quo as a result of her agreeing to the deal?

I think in the long run this may prove to be more beneficial then removing Mueller at this point, so as to prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that there was no collusion between candidate Trump & Russia during the campaign.

30 posted on 11/08/2017 3:34:54 PM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

I’m curious as to why you say that. Do you mind elaborating?


31 posted on 11/08/2017 3:36:24 PM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

Check out the youtube link in my previous post. Per his interview today on OAN, Gaetz has actually filed a resolution to create a special counsel to investigate Uranium One. My understanding is Congress has this ability, in the form of law, if the DoJ refuses to on their own.


32 posted on 11/08/2017 3:40:17 PM PST by Golden Eagle ("A lot of people are disappointed in the Justice Department, including me" - Trump on Nov 3, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
Wouldn’t it be better done in private?

I'm picturing the opening scene of an old western tv show called Branded.

Branded

33 posted on 11/08/2017 3:46:52 PM PST by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Oh okay good deal. Also Congress can indeed call for a Special Counsel.

Either the attorney general or Congress could appoint a special counsel, said William Banks, a professor and the founding director of the Institute for National Security and Counterterrorism at Syracuse University.

34 posted on 11/08/2017 3:46:57 PM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Not really, because the Democrats would holler obstruction.


35 posted on 11/08/2017 3:48:27 PM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stentor

I used to love that show. Vigilante justice at its finest.


36 posted on 11/08/2017 3:55:18 PM PST by Golden Eagle ("A lot of people are disappointed in the Justice Department, including me" - Trump on Nov 3, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

If the legislation for a new special counsel comes up for a vote, it could certainly bring this whole thing to a head. And, force people to choose sides. Unfortunately many would probably want to just hand it all over to Mueller, despite his obvious conflicts of interest, and questionable integrity on this very subject.


37 posted on 11/08/2017 3:59:17 PM PST by Golden Eagle ("A lot of people are disappointed in the Justice Department, including me" - Trump on Nov 3, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Major Matt Mason
I seriously do not believe this narrative that Mueller is really working to indict Democrats. I won't discount it completely, but I see absolutely nothing that leads me to believe this is the case. Why hasn't he at least indicted Tony Podesta with the same charges that Mamfort was charged with? I mean there is proof beyond a shadow of a doubt that he committed the exact same crime.

But I personally think that appointing a special counsel to look into Uranium One is the smart approach to take at this point in time. Supposedly a link has been provided, within this thread, where he does state he will call for this as well in an interview he had with OAN. I haven't looked at it yet, but I will be after this post.

38 posted on 11/08/2017 4:00:40 PM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
I went to the link provided, and I agree with everything he said. Perfect. 8>)

BTW, here he is on the floor of the House Gaetz Discusses Mueller's Conflict of Interests

39 posted on 11/08/2017 4:19:27 PM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

I’m not sure they could, at least not legally. But then we all know that legality is only for the citizens, and not the elite of the legislature, judicial or executive branches (unless of course they are Republicans) and Democrats are in the majority.


40 posted on 11/08/2017 4:45:39 PM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson