Posted on 10/24/2017 8:56:27 AM PDT by C19fan
"You know, am I mad at God? Yeah, I'm mad at him," O'Reilly said on the latest episode of his web series, "No Spin News." "I wish I had more protection. I wish this stuff didn't happen. I can't explain it to you. Yeah, I'm mad at him."
He then said that he derives perspective from the tribulations of others, including Kate Steinle, a woman who was allegedly shot by an undocumented immigrant who has been the subject of numerous O'Reilly commentaries.
(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...
He should sue the person who got the settlement and leaked it. Oh wait. That would open him to further inspection and who knows what would be found.
Those who blame God for all their troubles are big losers!
I don’t follow this. I’ve never been an O’Reilly fan.
I imagine that he may not be guilty of everything people say.
But I consider it reasonable to believe he’s guilty of some of it.
He should repent the actions for which he is responsible.
Expressing anger at God because Bill made bad choices seems ... unwise.
Why is he mad at God? God gave him free-will, and God's Church has warned for millennia on the fruits of sexual immorality. He simply chose not to pay attention.
Bill might ask you it depends on what the meaning of “is”, is.
Meaning, he wishes God had given him more impulse control? What a pathetic creature BOR is.
OReilly graduated from Chaminade Catholic HighSchool, where the good Fathers taught him the doctrine of free will. Too bad he used his free will to dominate and exploit women.
He should repent the actions for which he is responsible.
Expressing anger at God because Bill made bad choices seems ... unwise.
But there is the liability lottery that a lot of people have learned to play to get big payouts.
Bill may or may not be guilty of much more than having big pockets.
God didn’t write that $32 million settlement check. An amount you don’t write unless the alternative is PRISON
You are very naive.
Considering that he made several multi-million dollar payouts to his accusers, including one for $32 mil., I think that's a safe assumption.
Right on the money!
> But I consider it reasonable to believe hes guilty of some of it. <
If you are falsely accused of something terrible, would you fight it, or would you pay millions of dollars to hush it all up?
There’s always the publicity angle to consider, but I wouldn’t want to richly reward a false accuser. I’d fight it. And it makes me wonder about those who just pay out (Bill Clinton, Michael Jackson, Bill O’Reilly, etc.)
Didn’t Bill use the moniker “humble correspondent” when he had his show??? Always came off to me as being sarcastic; he oozed with pride and arrogance, much of which was not earned. One of the reasons I watched him was because he usually had pretty good guests. Just couldn’t get him to shut is oversized mouth long enough for them to make their point.
Anyway, Ted Baxter, you are old enough to know that it rains on the just and unjust alike. You may not be guilty of all of it, but your unceasing arrogance tells me you are guilty of some of it . . . . IMHO
Bill - there comes a time when you just have to STFU. Right or wrong you can’t win this battle in the press. For one thing, there’s been way to much smoke around you over the years for people to believe there’s been absolutely no fire.
He believes that God screwed him.
We tried to tell him he was wasting his time playing nice with Liberals.
Walk it back.
Did God make you sexually harass women? Really Bill?
You paid them off right?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.