It's over… We're not doing it': Sarah Jessica Parker confirms that Sex and the City 3 [tr]

UK Daily Mail ^ | September 29, 2017 | Cheyenne Roundtree and James Wilkinson

[C19fan]

Sarah Jessica Parker has confirmed that the third Sex and the City film will not go ahead following DailyMailTV's exclusive revelation that co-star Kim Cattrall put the kibosh on the film with her demands. Parker, 52, was approached by Extra at the New York City Ballet Gala on Thursday and asked about the future of the film. 'It's over… we're not doing it,' said the star, who was attending with husband Matthew Broderick, 55.

[ScottinVA]

Seriously... what would be their storyline now? “Grannies on the prowl?”

[FES0844]

Neigh, too funny!!!

[freedomlover]

"Seriously... what would be their storyline now? “Grannies on the prowl?”"

---

You gotta problem wid dat, eh?

[posterchild]

Have you searched vimeo or youtube for such shows?

[ScottinVA]

Kim has seen a bit too many winters to be making Sex-in-ANYTHING movies these days...

[dfwgator]

Lassie has grown up.

[Sans-Culotte]

I think the arguement was over the inclusion of the obligatory Cattrall nude scene. Cattrall wanted it left in, everybody else wanted it edited out.

Calling a film "Sex and the City" with those long-in-the-tooth actresses has a high "eeeeeeeeew" factor about it.

[dfwgator]

Sex in the City was basically about four gay males trapped in women’s bodies.

[silverleaf]

Or “ Sex in the Sixties”

[BlueHorseShoe]

I’m obviously in the minority here but I loved the series which was very cleverly written. I loved the movies although the first was far better. Good escapes and those of you who haven’t seen them you don’t know what is smart about some of the writing. It’s just fun and girlie stuff. The clothes and shoes!

And so what these women are getting older. So am I but I take care of myself too. Geez, we don’t exactly have to give up our sex appeal after a certain age. I, for one, was really looking forward to the third movie.

Do I despise these people’s personal politics? Yes! But I don’t take them seriously on that score. And if we only watched shows with people we agreed with it would be pretty sparse.

[Wuli]

Thank G-d!!!!

[Conserv]

It was a good show.

The truth is some men were/are just intimidated by it.

Making fun of men who are bad lovers, bad kissers, badly endowed(Gherkin episode), etc hits a little to close to home for them.

It’s a f’ing gherkin.

What can I say, I need a big one.

[BlueHorseShoe]

Haha. Yes, I remember that one. Funny. But they made equally as much fun of themselves. I know this sounds crazy — trust me — it DOES sound crazy, but they dispense some amazing good advice in those shows at times. Even my ex husband agreed and we’d laugh about it because it was so unexpected. That’s not why I watched however. It was just a great escape. Nothing more. I still watch the shows over again and always will. Call me shallow but I assure you I’m far from that. I just like what I like.

And who can forget “he’s just not that into you,” something we women never wanted to hear but is reality. Blunt. It’s actually smart writing. ;)

[Conserv]

Well put.

Often men can dish it out, but not take.

And, well, then there was the eye candy of Chris Noth(Mr.Big).

Another episode I loved was the horrendous kisser....

the guy who would just slobber all over Charlotte’s face.

[morphing libertarian]

I was hoping for a repeat of her trapeze scene from the tv series.

[morphing libertarian]

how old are you, 20?

[ScottinVA]

how old are you, 20?

How'd you know? ;-)

[morphing libertarian]

you can have all the women under 35. I’ll take the rest,

[ScottinVA]

Or “ Sex in the Sixties”

Or "Cougarama"

[ScottinVA]

Seriously though... Kim does look good for age 61. But another roll-in-the-sack-fest movie? Glad they’re thinking twice about that...